|
Volume : II, Issue : IX, October - 2012 The Concept Of Contempt Of Court In India (An Analytical Study) Omdutt and Manimala Rawat Published By : Laxmi Book Publication Abstract : The rule of Law is the cornerstone of civilized life and free and fearless justice
demands an independent court. The quintessence of contempt jurisprudence is
obstruction of or interference with the administration of justice. The key to court's
authority is people's confidence in that great institution and what shakes this faith is a
blow to democracy. So, independent of royal beginnings, no democracy can be
functional if justice is jejune and lacks the power to punish whoever challenges or chokes
its authority. On fundamentals, contempt jurisdiction is basic to the rule of law. And be
you ever so high the law is above you. The court being the principal instrumentality of
law and justice, contempt power wisely understood and rightly used has a democratic
basis. This hermeneutic perspective makes contempt power a people's tower all enough
to command obedience when justice is at stake and authoritarian contumacy attacks
judicial supremacy. In the general interest of the community it is imperative that the
authority of the courts should not be imperiled and there should be no unjustifiable
entrepreneur in the administration of justice. Keywords : Article : Cite This Article : Omdutt and Manimala Rawat, (2012). The Concept Of Contempt Of Court In India (An Analytical Study). Indian Streams Research Journal, Vol. II, Issue. IX, http://oldisrj.lbp.world/UploadedData/1496.pdf References : - Fox, The History of Contempt of Court (1927), p. 1.
- Vinay Chandra Mishra, In re, (1995)2 SCC 584, AIR 1995, SC 2348; Arundhati Roy, In re, (2002)3 SCC 343, Anil Ratan Sarkar V. Hirak Ghosh, (2002) 4 SCC 21.
- A.G.V. Times Newspaper Ltd. (1974) AC 273 at 315.
- Ahmed Ali V. Superintendent, District Jail Tejpur, 1987 Cri LJ 1845 (Gau).
- Reliance Petrochemicals Ltd. V. Indian Express Newspaper Bombay Private Ltd. (1988)4 SCC 582.
- Dattajirao Vs. Nani Palkiwala (1988)1 Bom Cr 13.
- Moazzem Hossain Vs. State (1983)35 Dhaka LR 290 (SC).
- Arundhati Roy In re (2002)3 SCC 343.
- Commr, Agra V. Rohtas Singh, (1998)1 SCC 349 AIR 1998 SC 685 1998 All LJ 299:1998 CriLJ 838.
- Supreme Court Bar Assn. V. Union of India, (1998)4 SCC 409.
- AIR 1969 Delhi 304.
- M.G. Amerthalingam V. K.P. Arunachalam (1969)1 MLJ 649.
- V. Raman Dutty Manon V. State of Kerala, 1986 CriLJ 758: (1986)1 Crimes 254: 1985 KLT 585.
- Girja Shankar V. Gopalji (1905)7 Bom LR951: ILR 30 Bom 241
- 1966 ALL WR (HC) 197:1966 ALL Cr R118.
- Ibid
- "Democracy in India and the Judicial Process" pp. 17-18,Lajpat Rai Memorial Lectures, 1963.
- The Writings of Thomas Jefferson III (Monticello Edition; Washington DC The Thomas Jefferson Memorial Association (1904) – Cited in North Dakota Law Review, Vol. 42 (1966 P. 186).
- 'The Road to Justice' P. 78.
- 1948 Report P. 27, Para 57.
|
Article Post Production
Article Indexed In
|