Scroll to Top

Volume : VI, Issue : V, June - 2016

STUDY OF INSTABILITY IN PRODUCTION OF MAJOR FIELD CROPS OF KARNATAKA: DISTRICTWISE ANALYSIS USING NONPARAMETRIC TESTS

Allappa Shankar Kamble , Vijaya B Wali

By : Laxmi Book Publication

Abstract :

In India Agriculture is one of the most prominent sectors contributing 28 per cent for its Gross National Product and the livelihood of more than two thirds of the population. As the economy grows, the scope of agricultural economy also expands horizontally and vertically.

Keywords :


    Article :


    Cite This Article :

    Allappa Shankar Kamble , Vijaya B Wali (2016). STUDY OF INSTABILITY IN PRODUCTION OF MAJOR FIELD CROPS OF KARNATAKA: DISTRICTWISE ANALYSIS USING NONPARAMETRIC TESTS. Indian Streams Research Journal, Vol. VI, Issue. V, http://isrj.org/UploadedData/8416.pdf

    References :

    1. Achoth Lalith., Nagaraj. N., Reddy. Keshava., Rebelloo. N. S. P. And Ramana. R., (1988), “A study of the growth and variability of pulse production in Karnataka”. Asian Economic Review 30(2) 274-287.
    2. Dhanashekaran. D. R., (2000), “The decomposition of agricultural output change into the source of technological technical efficiency and input changes using frontier production function approach”. Asian Economic Review, 35(3): 200-207.
    3. Dhindsa. K. K. and Sharma. A., (1996), “Growth of agricultural production and productivity in Punjab 1970-73 through 1990-93 - a component analysis”. Anvesak. 26(1): 51-61.
    4. Archana. Singh and Srivastava. R. S. L., (2003), “Growth and instability in sugarcane production in Uttar Pradesh: a regional study”. Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics. 58(2): 279-282.
    5. Dhanashekaran. D. R., (2000), “The decomposition of agricultural output change into the source of technological technical efficiency and input changes using frontier production function approach”. Asian Economic Review, 35(3): 200-207.
    6. Dhindsa. K. K. and Sharma. A., (1996), “Growth of agricultural production and productivity in Punjab 1970-73 through 1990-93 - a component analysis”. Anvesak. 26(1): 51-61.
    7. Archana. Singh and Srivastava. R. S. L., (2003), “Growth and instability in sugarcane production in Uttar Pradesh: a regional study”. Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics. 58(2): 279-282.
    8. Archana. Singh and Srivastava. R. S. L., (2003), “Growth and instability in sugarcane production in Uttar Pradesh: a regional study”. Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics. 58(2): 279-282.
    9. Dhanashekaran. D. R., (2000), “The decomposition of agricultural output change into the source of technological technical efficiency and input changes using frontier production function approach”. Asian Economic Review, 35(3): 200-207.
    10. Dhindsa. K. K. and Sharma. A., (1996), “Growth of agricultural production and productivity in Punjab 1970-73 through 1990-93 - a component analysis”. Anvesak. 26(1): 51-61.
    11. Dhindsa. K. K. and Sharma. A., (1996), “Growth of agricultural production and productivity in Punjab 1970-73 through 1990-93 - a component analysis”. Anvesak. 26(1): 51-61.
    12. Achoth Lalith., Nagaraj. N., Reddy. Keshava., Rebelloo. N. S. P. And Ramana. R., (1988), “A study of the growth and variability of pulse production in Karnataka”. Asian Economic Review 30(2) 274-287.
    13. Achoth Lalith., Nagaraj. N., Reddy. Keshava., Rebelloo. N. S. P. And Ramana. R., (1988), “A study of the growth and variability of pulse production in Karnataka”. Asian Economic Review 30(2) 274-287.
    14. Achoth Lalith., Nagaraj. N., Reddy. Keshava., Rebelloo. N. S. P. And Ramana. R., (1988), “A study of the growth and variability of pulse production in Karnataka”. Asian Economic Review 30(2) 274-287.
    15. Archana. Singh and Srivastava. R. S. L., (2003), “Growth and instability in sugarcane production in Uttar Pradesh: a regional study”. Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics. 58(2): 279-282.
    16. Dhanashekaran. D. R., (2000), “The decomposition of agricultural output change into the source of technological technical efficiency and input changes using frontier production function approach”. Asian Economic Review, 35(3): 200-207.
    17. Achoth Lalith., Nagaraj. N., Reddy. Keshava., Rebelloo. N. S. P. And Ramana. R., (1988), “A study of the growth and variability of pulse production in Karnataka”. Asian Economic Review 30(2) 274-287.
    18. Achoth Lalith., Nagaraj. N., Reddy. Keshava., Rebelloo. N. S. P. And Ramana. R., (1988), “A study of the growth and variability of pulse production in Karnataka”. Asian Economic Review 30(2) 274-287.
    19. Archana. Singh and Srivastava. R. S. L., (2003), “Growth and instability in sugarcane production in Uttar Pradesh: a regional study”. Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics. 58(2): 279-282.
    20. Dhanashekaran. D. R., (2000), “The decomposition of agricultural output change into the source of technological technical efficiency and input changes using frontier production function approach”. Asian Economic Review, 35(3): 200-207.
    21. Dhindsa. K. K. and Sharma. A., (1996), “Growth of agricultural production and productivity in Punjab 1970-73 through 1990-93 - a component analysis”. Anvesak. 26(1): 51-61.

    Article Post Production

      No data exists for the row/column.
    Creative Commons License
    Indian Streams Research Journal by Laxmi Book Publication is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
    Based on a work at http://oldisrj.lbp.world/Default.aspx.
    Permissions beyond the scope of this license may be available at http://oldisrj.lbp.world/Default.aspx
    Copyright � 2014 Indian Streams Research Journal. All rights reserved
    Looking for information? Browse our FAQs, tour our sitemap, or contact ISRJ
    Read our Privacy Policy Statement and Plagairism Policy. Use of this site signifies your agreement to the Terms of Use