Scroll to Top

Volume : IV, Issue : I, February - 2014

MADRAS LEGISLATIVE DEBATE OVER “THE WHITE PAPER” ON PANCHAYAT ADMINISTRATION

R. Kumaran, -

By : Laxmi Book Publication

Abstract :

The White Paper placed before the Madras Legislature on 29th September 1956 could not be discussed before the legislature was dissolved on 25th October 1956. Parliamentary and State elections intervened in early 1957. After the new ministry assumed office , a cabinet commit was appointed to consider the future of local administration. It presented a revised provisional conclusions in the shape of another White Paper in October 1957. It set out a five-year programme commencing from 1957 -1958 for complete coverage of the state with panchayats constituted under the Madras Village Panchayats Act of 1950 , and aimed at improving the efficiency of panchayat administration , and reducing the evil of factions in the panchayat organisation

Keywords :


    Article :


    Cite This Article :

    R. Kumaran, -(2014). MADRAS LEGISLATIVE DEBATE OVER “THE WHITE PAPER” ON PANCHAYAT ADMINISTRATION. Indian Streams Research Journal, Vol. IV, Issue. I, http://isrj.org/UploadedData/3652.pdf

    References :

    1. Ibid, pp. 254-258 (speech by T.P. Srinivasavaradan).
    2. Ibid, pp. 254-258 (speech by T.P. Srinivasavaradan).
    3. Ibid, p.244.
    4. Ibid., pp. 296-297.
    5. Ibid.,pp.261-268.
    6. Ibid. pp. 261-264 (speech by K. Balasubramania Ayyar).
    7. Ibid., pp. 263-265.
    8. Ibid., Vol. XXI, 1951, p. 250. It was quoted by T. Purushotham that the inspector of local boards and the head of the department had observed that in course of time, the scheme would relegate the panchayats and panchayat unions to the position
    9. Ibid., pp. 263-265.
    10. Ibid, p.244.
    11. Pillay, K.K., History of Local Self- Government in the Madras Presidency, 1850-1919, Chunilal D. Barfivala, Bombay, 1953, p.i.
    12. Madras Legislative Assembly Debates , Vol.VI, 1957, pp.165-170 and 247-258.
    13. of a subordinate branch of the revenue department and would lead to administrative difficulties.
    14. Ibid. pp. 261-264 (speech by K. Balasubramania Ayyar).
    15. Ibid., pp. 276-277 .
    16. Ibid., Vol. XXI, 1951, p. 250. It was quoted by T. Purushotham that the inspector of local boards and the head of the department had observed that in course of time, the scheme would relegate the panchayats and panchayat unions to the position
    17. Ibid., pp. 276-277 .
    18. Ibid. pp. 261-264 (speech by K. Balasubramania Ayyar).
    19. Madras Legislative Assembly Debates , Vol.VI, 1957, pp.165-170 and 247-258.
    20. of a subordinate branch of the revenue department and would lead to administrative difficulties.
    21. Madras Legislative Assembly Debates , Vol.VI, 1957, pp.165-170 and 247-258.
    22. Ibid, pp. 254-258 (speech by T.P. Srinivasavaradan).
    23. of a subordinate branch of the revenue department and would lead to administrative difficulties.
    24. Ibid., pp. 276-277 .
    25. Ibid. pp. 261-264 (speech by K. Balasubramania Ayyar).
    26. Ibid, pp. 254-258 (speech by T.P. Srinivasavaradan).
    27. Madras Legislative Assembly Debates , Vol.VI, 1957, pp.165-170 and 247-258.
    28. of a subordinate branch of the revenue department and would lead to administrative difficulties.
    29. Ibid., Vol. XXI, 1951, p. 250. It was quoted by T. Purushotham that the inspector of local boards and the head of the department had observed that in course of time, the scheme would relegate the panchayats and panchayat unions to the position
    30. Ibid. pp. 261-264 (speech by K. Balasubramania Ayyar).
    31. Madras Legislative Assembly Debates , Vol.VI, 1957, pp.165-170 and 247-258.
    32. of a subordinate branch of the revenue department and would lead to administrative difficulties.
    33. Ibid, pp. 254-258 (speech by T.P. Srinivasavaradan).
    34. Ibid.,pp.261-268.
    35. Ibid., pp. 276-277 .
    36. Ibid, p.244.
    37. Ibid., pp. 276-277 .
    38. Ibid., pp. 263-265.
    39. Ibid. pp. 261-264 (speech by K. Balasubramania Ayyar).
    40. Ibid., Vol. XXI, 1951, p. 250. It was quoted by T. Purushotham that the inspector of local boards and the head of the department had observed that in course of time, the scheme would relegate the panchayats and panchayat unions to the position
    41. Ibid. pp. 261-264 (speech by K. Balasubramania Ayyar).
    42. Pillay, K.K., History of Local Self- Government in the Madras Presidency, 1850-1919, Chunilal D. Barfivala, Bombay, 1953, p.i.
    43. Ibid, pp. 254-258 (speech by T.P. Srinivasavaradan).
    44. Ibid, pp. 254-258 (speech by T.P. Srinivasavaradan).
    45. Ibid. pp. 261-264 (speech by K. Balasubramania Ayyar).
    46. Ibid.,pp.261-268.
    47. Ibid.,pp.261-268.
    48. Ibid., pp. 263-265.
    49. Pillay, K.K., History of Local Self- Government in the Madras Presidency, 1850-1919, Chunilal D. Barfivala, Bombay, 1953, p.i.
    50. Ibid., pp. 296-297.
    51. Ibid, p.244.
    52. Madras Legislative Assembly Debates , Vol.VI, 1957, pp.165-170 and 247-258.
    53. of a subordinate branch of the revenue department and would lead to administrative difficulties.
    54. Ibid. pp. 261-264 (speech by K. Balasubramania Ayyar).
    55. Madras Legislative Assembly Debates , Vol.VI, 1957, pp.165-170 and 247-258.
    56. of a subordinate branch of the revenue department and would lead to administrative difficulties.
    57. Ibid, p.244.
    58. Ibid., pp. 296-297.
    59. Ibid. pp. 261-264 (speech by K. Balasubramania Ayyar).
    60. Ibid., pp. 263-265.
    61. Pillay, K.K., History of Local Self- Government in the Madras Presidency, 1850-1919, Chunilal D. Barfivala, Bombay, 1953, p.i.
    62. Ibid, p.244.
    63. Ibid., pp. 263-265.
    64. Ibid.,pp.261-268.
    65. Ibid, pp. 254-258 (speech by T.P. Srinivasavaradan).
    66. Ibid., pp. 276-277 .
    67. Ibid., pp. 276-277 .
    68. Ibid, p.244.
    69. Ibid., Vol. XXI, 1951, p. 250. It was quoted by T. Purushotham that the inspector of local boards and the head of the department had observed that in course of time, the scheme would relegate the panchayats and panchayat unions to the position
    70. Ibid.,pp.261-268.
    71. Ibid. pp. 261-264 (speech by K. Balasubramania Ayyar).
    72. Ibid., pp. 263-265.
    73. Madras Legislative Assembly Debates , Vol.VI, 1957, pp.165-170 and 247-258.
    74. of a subordinate branch of the revenue department and would lead to administrative difficulties.
    75. Ibid.,pp.261-268.
    76. Madras Legislative Assembly Debates , Vol.VI, 1957, pp.165-170 and 247-258.
    77. of a subordinate branch of the revenue department and would lead to administrative difficulties.
    78. Ibid., pp. 263-265.
    79. Ibid., pp. 263-265.
    80. Pillay, K.K., History of Local Self- Government in the Madras Presidency, 1850-1919, Chunilal D. Barfivala, Bombay, 1953, p.i.
    81. Ibid. pp. 261-264 (speech by K. Balasubramania Ayyar).
    82. Ibid., pp. 263-265.
    83. Ibid. pp. 261-264 (speech by K. Balasubramania Ayyar).
    84. Pillay, K.K., History of Local Self- Government in the Madras Presidency, 1850-1919, Chunilal D. Barfivala, Bombay, 1953, p.i.
    85. Ibid., pp. 296-297.
    86. Madras Legislative Assembly Debates , Vol.VI, 1957, pp.165-170 and 247-258.
    87. of a subordinate branch of the revenue department and would lead to administrative difficulties.
    88. Ibid., pp. 296-297.
    89. Ibid., pp. 296-297.
    90. Ibid, p.244.
    91. Ibid., pp. 276-277 .
    92. Ibid., pp. 296-297.
    93. Ibid. pp. 261-264 (speech by K. Balasubramania Ayyar).
    94. Ibid., Vol. XXI, 1951, p. 250. It was quoted by T. Purushotham that the inspector of local boards and the head of the department had observed that in course of time, the scheme would relegate the panchayats and panchayat unions to the position
    95. Ibid. pp. 261-264 (speech by K. Balasubramania Ayyar).
    96. Ibid.,pp.261-268.
    97. Ibid., pp. 263-265.
    98. Ibid. pp. 261-264 (speech by K. Balasubramania Ayyar).
    99. Madras Legislative Assembly Debates , Vol.VI, 1957, pp.165-170 and 247-258.
    100. of a subordinate branch of the revenue department and would lead to administrative difficulties.
    101. Ibid., Vol. XXI, 1951, p. 250. It was quoted by T. Purushotham that the inspector of local boards and the head of the department had observed that in course of time, the scheme would relegate the panchayats and panchayat unions to the position
    102. Ibid. pp. 261-264 (speech by K. Balasubramania Ayyar).
    103. Ibid., pp. 276-277 .
    104. Ibid., pp. 276-277 .
    105. Madras Legislative Assembly Debates , Vol.VI, 1957, pp.165-170 and 247-258.
    106. of a subordinate branch of the revenue department and would lead to administrative difficulties.
    107. Ibid, p.244.
    108. Ibid, pp. 254-258 (speech by T.P. Srinivasavaradan).
    109. Ibid., pp. 296-297.
    110. Ibid., pp. 263-265.
    111. Ibid., pp. 296-297.
    112. Ibid., Vol. XXI, 1951, p. 250. It was quoted by T. Purushotham that the inspector of local boards and the head of the department had observed that in course of time, the scheme would relegate the panchayats and panchayat unions to the position
    113. Madras Legislative Assembly Debates , Vol.VI, 1957, pp.165-170 and 247-258.
    114. of a subordinate branch of the revenue department and would lead to administrative difficulties.
    115. Pillay, K.K., History of Local Self- Government in the Madras Presidency, 1850-1919, Chunilal D. Barfivala, Bombay, 1953, p.i.
    116. Madras Legislative Assembly Debates , Vol.VI, 1957, pp.165-170 and 247-258.
    117. of a subordinate branch of the revenue department and would lead to administrative difficulties.
    118. Ibid, p.244.
    119. Ibid. pp. 261-264 (speech by K. Balasubramania Ayyar).
    120. Ibid., pp. 276-277 .
    121. Ibid., Vol. XXI, 1951, p. 250. It was quoted by T. Purushotham that the inspector of local boards and the head of the department had observed that in course of time, the scheme would relegate the panchayats and panchayat unions to the position
    122. Pillay, K.K., History of Local Self- Government in the Madras Presidency, 1850-1919, Chunilal D. Barfivala, Bombay, 1953, p.i.
    123. Ibid., pp. 296-297.
    124. Ibid., Vol. XXI, 1951, p. 250. It was quoted by T. Purushotham that the inspector of local boards and the head of the department had observed that in course of time, the scheme would relegate the panchayats and panchayat unions to the position
    125. Pillay, K.K., History of Local Self- Government in the Madras Presidency, 1850-1919, Chunilal D. Barfivala, Bombay, 1953, p.i.
    126. Ibid. pp. 261-264 (speech by K. Balasubramania Ayyar).
    127. Madras Legislative Assembly Debates , Vol.VI, 1957, pp.165-170 and 247-258.
    128. of a subordinate branch of the revenue department and would lead to administrative difficulties.
    129. Ibid., Vol. XXI, 1951, p. 250. It was quoted by T. Purushotham that the inspector of local boards and the head of the department had observed that in course of time, the scheme would relegate the panchayats and panchayat unions to the position
    130. Ibid, pp. 254-258 (speech by T.P. Srinivasavaradan).
    131. Madras Legislative Assembly Debates , Vol.VI, 1957, pp.165-170 and 247-258.
    132. of a subordinate branch of the revenue department and would lead to administrative difficulties.
    133. Ibid. pp. 261-264 (speech by K. Balasubramania Ayyar).
    134. Ibid., Vol. XXI, 1951, p. 250. It was quoted by T. Purushotham that the inspector of local boards and the head of the department had observed that in course of time, the scheme would relegate the panchayats and panchayat unions to the position
    135. Ibid. pp. 261-264 (speech by K. Balasubramania Ayyar).
    136. Ibid. pp. 261-264 (speech by K. Balasubramania Ayyar).
    137. Ibid. pp. 261-264 (speech by K. Balasubramania Ayyar).
    138. Ibid., pp. 276-277 .
    139. Madras Legislative Assembly Debates , Vol.VI, 1957, pp.165-170 and 247-258.
    140. of a subordinate branch of the revenue department and would lead to administrative difficulties.
    141. Ibid., pp. 276-277 .
    142. Ibid., pp. 276-277 .
    143. Ibid. pp. 261-264 (speech by K. Balasubramania Ayyar).
    144. Ibid., pp. 276-277 .
    145. Ibid, p.244.
    146. Ibid., pp. 296-297.
    147. Ibid. pp. 261-264 (speech by K. Balasubramania Ayyar).
    148. Ibid., pp. 276-277 .
    149. Ibid., pp. 276-277 .
    150. Ibid.,pp.261-268.
    151. Madras Legislative Assembly Debates , Vol.VI, 1957, pp.165-170 and 247-258.
    152. of a subordinate branch of the revenue department and would lead to administrative difficulties.
    153. Ibid., pp. 263-265.
    154. Ibid, pp. 254-258 (speech by T.P. Srinivasavaradan).
    155. Ibid., pp. 263-265.
    156. Ibid., pp. 276-277 .
    157. Ibid., pp. 296-297.
    158. Ibid. pp. 261-264 (speech by K. Balasubramania Ayyar).
    159. Ibid., pp. 263-265.
    160. Madras Legislative Assembly Debates , Vol.VI, 1957, pp.165-170 and 247-258.
    161. of a subordinate branch of the revenue department and would lead to administrative difficulties.
    162. Ibid. pp. 261-264 (speech by K. Balasubramania Ayyar).
    163. Ibid, pp. 254-258 (speech by T.P. Srinivasavaradan).
    164. Pillay, K.K., History of Local Self- Government in the Madras Presidency, 1850-1919, Chunilal D. Barfivala, Bombay, 1953, p.i.
    165. Ibid., pp. 276-277 .
    166. Ibid. pp. 261-264 (speech by K. Balasubramania Ayyar).
    167. Ibid, p.244.
    168. Ibid. pp. 261-264 (speech by K. Balasubramania Ayyar).
    169. Ibid, pp. 254-258 (speech by T.P. Srinivasavaradan).
    170. Pillay, K.K., History of Local Self- Government in the Madras Presidency, 1850-1919, Chunilal D. Barfivala, Bombay, 1953, p.i.
    171. of a subordinate branch of the revenue department and would lead to administrative difficulties.
    172. Ibid, p.244.
    173. Ibid., pp. 263-265.
    174. Madras Legislative Assembly Debates , Vol.VI, 1957, pp.165-170 and 247-258.
    175. of a subordinate branch of the revenue department and would lead to administrative difficulties.
    176. Ibid., pp. 263-265.
    177. Ibid, p.244.
    178. Pillay, K.K., History of Local Self- Government in the Madras Presidency, 1850-1919, Chunilal D. Barfivala, Bombay, 1953, p.i.
    179. Pillay, K.K., History of Local Self- Government in the Madras Presidency, 1850-1919, Chunilal D. Barfivala, Bombay, 1953, p.i.
    180. Ibid., Vol. XXI, 1951, p. 250. It was quoted by T. Purushotham that the inspector of local boards and the head of the department had observed that in course of time, the scheme would relegate the panchayats and panchayat unions to the position
    181. Ibid., pp. 296-297.
    182. Ibid., pp. 276-277 .
    183. Ibid., pp. 263-265.
    184. Pillay, K.K., History of Local Self- Government in the Madras Presidency, 1850-1919, Chunilal D. Barfivala, Bombay, 1953, p.i.
    185. Ibid. pp. 261-264 (speech by K. Balasubramania Ayyar).
    186. Ibid.,pp.261-268.
    187. Madras Legislative Assembly Debates , Vol.VI, 1957, pp.165-170 and 247-258.
    188. of a subordinate branch of the revenue department and would lead to administrative difficulties.
    189. Ibid.,pp.261-268.
    190. Ibid., Vol. XXI, 1951, p. 250. It was quoted by T. Purushotham that the inspector of local boards and the head of the department had observed that in course of time, the scheme would relegate the panchayats and panchayat unions to the position
    191. Ibid., pp. 296-297.
    192. Ibid., pp. 263-265.
    193. Madras Legislative Assembly Debates , Vol.VI, 1957, pp.165-170 and 247-258.
    194. Ibid.,pp.261-268.
    195. Ibid. pp. 261-264 (speech by K. Balasubramania Ayyar).
    196. Ibid. pp. 261-264 (speech by K. Balasubramania Ayyar).
    197. Ibid, pp. 254-258 (speech by T.P. Srinivasavaradan).
    198. Ibid., pp. 296-297.
    199. Madras Legislative Assembly Debates , Vol.VI, 1957, pp.165-170 and 247-258.
    200. of a subordinate branch of the revenue department and would lead to administrative difficulties.
    201. Pillay, K.K., History of Local Self- Government in the Madras Presidency, 1850-1919, Chunilal D. Barfivala, Bombay, 1953, p.i.
    202. Ibid., pp. 296-297.
    203. Ibid., pp. 263-265.
    204. Ibid. pp. 261-264 (speech by K. Balasubramania Ayyar).
    205. Ibid, pp. 254-258 (speech by T.P. Srinivasavaradan).
    206. Ibid.,pp.261-268.
    207. Ibid. pp. 261-264 (speech by K. Balasubramania Ayyar).
    208. Madras Legislative Assembly Debates , Vol.VI, 1957, pp.165-170 and 247-258.
    209. of a subordinate branch of the revenue department and would lead to administrative difficulties.
    210. Ibid, pp. 254-258 (speech by T.P. Srinivasavaradan).
    211. Ibid., Vol. XXI, 1951, p. 250. It was quoted by T. Purushotham that the inspector of local boards and the head of the department had observed that in course of time, the scheme would relegate the panchayats and panchayat unions to the position
    212. Ibid., Vol. XXI, 1951, p. 250. It was quoted by T. Purushotham that the inspector of local boards and the head of the department had observed that in course of time, the scheme would relegate the panchayats and panchayat unions to the position
    213. Ibid., Vol. XXI, 1951, p. 250. It was quoted by T. Purushotham that the inspector of local boards and the head of the department had observed that in course of time, the scheme would relegate the panchayats and panchayat unions to the position
    214. Ibid. pp. 261-264 (speech by K. Balasubramania Ayyar).
    215. Ibid., Vol. XXI, 1951, p. 250. It was quoted by T. Purushotham that the inspector of local boards and the head of the department had observed that in course of time, the scheme would relegate the panchayats and panchayat unions to the position
    216. Ibid. pp. 261-264 (speech by K. Balasubramania Ayyar).
    217. Ibid., pp. 296-297.
    218. Ibid., pp. 263-265.
    219. Ibid., Vol. XXI, 1951, p. 250. It was quoted by T. Purushotham that the inspector of local boards and the head of the department had observed that in course of time, the scheme would relegate the panchayats and panchayat unions to the position
    220. Ibid, p.244.
    221. Ibid. pp. 261-264 (speech by K. Balasubramania Ayyar).
    222. Ibid., pp. 263-265.
    223. Madras Legislative Assembly Debates , Vol.VI, 1957, pp.165-170 and 247-258.
    224. of a subordinate branch of the revenue department and would lead to administrative difficulties.
    225. Pillay, K.K., History of Local Self- Government in the Madras Presidency, 1850-1919, Chunilal D. Barfivala, Bombay, 1953, p.i.
    226. Madras Legislative Assembly Debates , Vol.VI, 1957, pp.165-170 and 247-258.
    227. Pillay, K.K., History of Local Self- Government in the Madras Presidency, 1850-1919, Chunilal D. Barfivala, Bombay, 1953, p.i.
    228. of a subordinate branch of the revenue department and would lead to administrative difficulties.
    229. Madras Legislative Assembly Debates , Vol.VI, 1957, pp.165-170 and 247-258.
    230. of a subordinate branch of the revenue department and would lead to administrative difficulties.
    231. Ibid, p.244.
    232. Madras Legislative Assembly Debates , Vol.VI, 1957, pp.165-170 and 247-258.
    233. of a subordinate branch of the revenue department and would lead to administrative difficulties.
    234. Ibid. pp. 261-264 (speech by K. Balasubramania Ayyar).
    235. Ibid., pp. 276-277 .
    236. Ibid., pp. 296-297.
    237. Ibid.,pp.261-268.
    238. Madras Legislative Assembly Debates , Vol.VI, 1957, pp.165-170 and 247-258.
    239. of a subordinate branch of the revenue department and would lead to administrative difficulties.
    240. Ibid., pp. 276-277 .
    241. Madras Legislative Assembly Debates , Vol.VI, 1957, pp.165-170 and 247-258.
    242. of a subordinate branch of the revenue department and would lead to administrative difficulties.
    243. Pillay, K.K., History of Local Self- Government in the Madras Presidency, 1850-1919, Chunilal D. Barfivala, Bombay, 1953, p.i.
    244. Ibid., pp. 263-265.
    245. Ibid., Vol. XXI, 1951, p. 250. It was quoted by T. Purushotham that the inspector of local boards and the head of the department had observed that in course of time, the scheme would relegate the panchayats and panchayat unions to the position
    246. Ibid. pp. 261-264 (speech by K. Balasubramania Ayyar).
    247. Ibid., Vol. XXI, 1951, p. 250. It was quoted by T. Purushotham that the inspector of local boards and the head of the department had observed that in course of time, the scheme would relegate the panchayats and panchayat unions to the position
    248. Ibid. pp. 261-264 (speech by K. Balasubramania Ayyar).
    249. Ibid., pp. 263-265.
    250. Ibid., pp. 263-265.
    251. Ibid, p.244.
    252. Ibid, p.244.
    253. Madras Legislative Assembly Debates , Vol.VI, 1957, pp.165-170 and 247-258.
    254. of a subordinate branch of the revenue department and would lead to administrative difficulties.
    255. Pillay, K.K., History of Local Self- Government in the Madras Presidency, 1850-1919, Chunilal D. Barfivala, Bombay, 1953, p.i.
    256. Ibid. pp. 261-264 (speech by K. Balasubramania Ayyar).
    257. Pillay, K.K., History of Local Self- Government in the Madras Presidency, 1850-1919, Chunilal D. Barfivala, Bombay, 1953, p.i.
    258. Ibid. pp. 261-264 (speech by K. Balasubramania Ayyar).
    259. Ibid., pp. 296-297.
    260. Ibid. pp. 261-264 (speech by K. Balasubramania Ayyar).
    261. Ibid. pp. 261-264 (speech by K. Balasubramania Ayyar).
    262. Ibid.,pp.261-268.
    263. Ibid. pp. 261-264 (speech by K. Balasubramania Ayyar).
    264. Ibid., Vol. XXI, 1951, p. 250. It was quoted by T. Purushotham that the inspector of local boards and the head of the department had observed that in course of time, the scheme would relegate the panchayats and panchayat unions to the position
    265. Madras Legislative Assembly Debates , Vol.VI, 1957, pp.165-170 and 247-258.
    266. of a subordinate branch of the revenue department and would lead to administrative difficulties.
    267. Madras Legislative Assembly Debates , Vol.VI, 1957, pp.165-170 and 247-258.
    268. of a subordinate branch of the revenue department and would lead to administrative difficulties.
    269. Ibid., pp. 296-297.
    270. Ibid, p.244.
    271. Ibid, p.244.
    272. Ibid. pp. 261-264 (speech by K. Balasubramania Ayyar).
    273. Ibid, p.244.
    274. Ibid. pp. 261-264 (speech by K. Balasubramania Ayyar).
    275. Pillay, K.K., History of Local Self- Government in the Madras Presidency, 1850-1919, Chunilal D. Barfivala, Bombay, 1953, p.i.
    276. Ibid. pp. 261-264 (speech by K. Balasubramania Ayyar).
    277. Ibid.,pp.261-268.
    278. Ibid., pp. 296-297.
    279. Ibid.,pp.261-268.
    280. Ibid., Vol. XXI, 1951, p. 250. It was quoted by T. Purushotham that the inspector of local boards and the head of the department had observed that in course of time, the scheme would relegate the panchayats and panchayat unions to the position
    281. Ibid. pp. 261-264 (speech by K. Balasubramania Ayyar).
    282. Ibid. pp. 261-264 (speech by K. Balasubramania Ayyar).
    283. Ibid., Vol. XXI, 1951, p. 250. It was quoted by T. Purushotham that the inspector of local boards and the head of the department had observed that in course of time, the scheme would relegate the panchayats and panchayat unions to the position
    284. Ibid., pp. 276-277 .
    285. Ibid., pp. 263-265.
    286. Ibid., pp. 276-277 .
    287. Ibid., pp. 276-277 .
    288. Ibid., Vol. XXI, 1951, p. 250. It was quoted by T. Purushotham that the inspector of local boards and the head of the department had observed that in course of time, the scheme would relegate the panchayats and panchayat unions to the position
    289. Ibid, pp. 254-258 (speech by T.P. Srinivasavaradan).
    290. Ibid., Vol. XXI, 1951, p. 250. It was quoted by T. Purushotham that the inspector of local boards and the head of the department had observed that in course of time, the scheme would relegate the panchayats and panchayat unions to the position
    291. Ibid, pp. 254-258 (speech by T.P. Srinivasavaradan).
    292. Ibid., pp. 296-297.
    293. Ibid, p.244.
    294. Ibid, pp. 254-258 (speech by T.P. Srinivasavaradan).
    295. Ibid.,pp.261-268.
    296. Ibid. pp. 261-264 (speech by K. Balasubramania Ayyar).
    297. Ibid, pp. 254-258 (speech by T.P. Srinivasavaradan).
    298. Ibid.,pp.261-268.
    299. Ibid., pp. 276-277 .
    300. Ibid., Vol. XXI, 1951, p. 250. It was quoted by T. Purushotham that the inspector of local boards and the head of the department had observed that in course of time, the scheme would relegate the panchayats and panchayat unions to the position
    301. Ibid., pp. 296-297.
    302. Ibid., pp. 263-265.
    303. Ibid.,pp.261-268.
    304. Ibid. pp. 261-264 (speech by K. Balasubramania Ayyar).
    305. Ibid. pp. 261-264 (speech by K. Balasubramania Ayyar).
    306. Ibid. pp. 261-264 (speech by K. Balasubramania Ayyar).
    307. Ibid.,pp.261-268.
    308. Ibid., pp. 296-297.
    309. Ibid.,pp.261-268.
    310. Ibid, p.244.
    311. Ibid., Vol. XXI, 1951, p. 250. It was quoted by T. Purushotham that the inspector of local boards and the head of the department had observed that in course of time, the scheme would relegate the panchayats and panchayat unions to the position
    312. Ibid, p.244.
    313. Ibid, p.244.
    314. Ibid, pp. 254-258 (speech by T.P. Srinivasavaradan).
    315. Ibid.,pp.261-268.
    316. Ibid, pp. 254-258 (speech by T.P. Srinivasavaradan).
    317. Ibid, p.244.
    318. Ibid., pp. 296-297.

    Article Post Production

      No data exists for the row/column.
    Creative Commons License
    Indian Streams Research Journal by Laxmi Book Publication is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
    Based on a work at http://oldisrj.lbp.world/Default.aspx.
    Permissions beyond the scope of this license may be available at http://oldisrj.lbp.world/Default.aspx
    Copyright � 2014 Indian Streams Research Journal. All rights reserved
    Looking for information? Browse our FAQs, tour our sitemap, or contact ISRJ
    Read our Privacy Policy Statement and Plagairism Policy. Use of this site signifies your agreement to the Terms of Use