DOI Prefix : 10.9780 | Journal DOI : 10.9780/22307850
Scroll to Top

Volume : III, Issue : III, April - 2013

THE ROLE OF COMMUNICATION IN TEAM EFFECTIVENESS: A CASE STUDY

FAREEDA IBAD

DOI : 10.9780/22307850, Published By : Laxmi Book Publication

Abstract :

Teams have become the foundation of progressive organizations, and information relating to the determinants that contribute to team accomplishment have extensive connotations for organizations aspiring to augment team effectiveness. The question of uncovering the characteristic features of communication and the role of communication among other factors as a determinant of team effectiveness is the central aim of this study. The research challenge central to this study is to find ways to achieve a desirable communication level that facilitates team performance. The empirical analysis involved collection of data through focus group interviews involving 5 participants in a prominent Pakistani bank using an interview guide featuring semistructured questions. The qualitative data analysis revealed that 'open' communication is a characteristic feature allowing a team to be effective. The barriers to team effectiveness were identified and recommendations for further research were also presented.

Keywords :


Article :


Cite This Article :

FAREEDA IBAD, (2013). THE ROLE OF COMMUNICATION IN TEAM EFFECTIVENESS: A CASE STUDY. Indian Streams Research Journal, Vol. III, Issue. III, DOI : 10.9780/22307850, http://oldisrj.lbp.world/UploadedData/2237.pdf

References :

  1. Anonymous (2008). Pulling in the same direction. Director, 61 (8), 40.
  2. Baltes, B. B., Dickson, M. W., Sherman, M. P., Bauer, C. C., & LaGanke, J. S. (2002). Computer–mediated communication and group discussion making: A meta-analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 87 (1), 156 – 179
  3. Baninajarian, N., Abdullah, Z. A. (2009). Groups in context: A model of group effectiveness. European Journal of Social Sciences, 8 (2), 335-340
  4. Barnlund, D. C. (1959). A comparative study of individual, majority, and team judgment. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 58, 55 – 60.
  5. Birdwhistell, R. L. (1970). Kinesics and context: Essays on body motion communication. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press
  6. Broome, B. J., Fulbright, L. A. (1995). A multistage influence model of barriers to group problem solving: A participant – generated agenda for small group research. Small Group Research, 26 (1), 25-55.
  7. Buzaglo, G., and Wheelan, S. A. (1999). Facilitation work team effectiveness: case studies from Central America. Small group Research, 30 (1), 108 – 129.
  8. Cohen, S. G., Bailey, D. E. (1997). What makes teams work: Group effectiveness from the shop floor to the executive suite. Journal of Management, 23, 239-290.
  9. Cowie, L. (2007). An investigation into the components impacting the effective functioning of management teams in small business. Unpublished honors treatise. Port Elizabeth: Nelson Mandela Metropolitan University.
  10. Denzin, N., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2005). The sage handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
  11. Dickinson, T. L., & McIntyne, R. M. (1997). A conceptual framework of team measurement. In, M. T. Branwick., E. Sales., & C. Prince (Eds.). Team performance assessment and measurement. Theory, methods, and applications. 331-356. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  12. Dionne, S. S., Yammarino, F. J., Atwater, L. E., and Spangler, W. D. (2004). Transformational leadership and team performance. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 17 (2), 177 – 193.
  13. DeSanctis, G., & Jiang, L. (2005). Communication and the learning effectiveness of multinational teams. Advances in International Management, 18, 97 - 123
  14. Driskell, J. E., Olmstead, B., and Salas, E. (1993). Task cues, dominance cues, and influence in task groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78 (1), 51-60.
  15. Dyer, W.G. (1987), Team Building. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley Publishing Company. Fisher, B. A. (1970). Decision emergence: phase in group decision making. Speech Monographs, 37 (1), 53 - 66.
  16. Fisher, B. A. (1970). The process of decision modification in small discussion groups. Journal of Communication, 20 (1), 51-64.
  17. Gouran, D.S. (1991). The evolution of functional theory as applied to communication in decision-making groups. Paper presented at the Central States Communication Association Convention, Chicago, IL.
  18. Hackman, J. R., Wageman, R. (2005). A theory of team coaching. The Academy of Management Review, 30 (2), 269 – 287
  19. Hackman, J. R., & Morris, C. G. (1975). Group tasks, group interaction process, and group performance – effectiveness: A review and proposed integration. , 8, 45-99. Hassall, S. L. (2009). The relationship between communication and team performance: testing moderators and identifying communication profiles in established work teams. Doctoral Dissertation retrieved from eprints.qut.edu.au
  20. Henderson, S. & Walkinshaw, O. (2002). Command team assessment: Principles, guidance and observations. Unpublished report. QinetiQ, Fort Halstead
  21. Hirokawa, R. Y. (1988). Group communication and decision – making performance: A continued test of functional perspective. Human Communication Research, 14, 487 – 515.
  22. Hirokawa, R. Y. (1985). Discussion procedure and decision making performance. A test of a functional perspective. Human Communication Research, 12, 203 – 224
  23. Hirokawa, R. Y., Degooyer, D. & Valde, K. (2000). Using narratives of study task group effectiveness. Small Group Research, 31(5), 573 - 591.
  24. Hitt, M. A., Miller, C. C., & Colella, A. (2006). Organisational behavior: A systematic approach. New York: John Wiley.
  25. Ivancevich, J., Konopaske, I. & Matteson, M. (2005). Organizational behavior and management (7th ed.).
  26. New York: McGraw Hill Companies, Inc. Keen, T.R. (2003). Creating effective and successful teams. United States of America: Purdue University Press.
  27. Shannan, P. (2001). Mapping team performance shaping factors. QinetiQ, Fort Halstead. Shaw, J. B., Barret-Power, E. (1998). The effects of diversity on small work group processes and performance. Human Relations, 51 (10), 1307-1326.
  28. Keen, T.R. (2003). Creating effective and successful teams. United States of America: Purdue University Press. McGrath J. E. (1991).Time, interaction and performance (TIP): A theory of groups. Small Group Research, 22 (2), 147 – 174. Osterman, P. (2000). Work reorganization in an era of restructuring: Trends in diffusion and effects of employee welfare. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 53 (2), 179-196. Patton, B. R., Downs, T. M. (2003). Decision-making group interaction: Achieving quality (4th ed.). Boston; London: Allyn and Bacon. Rocine, V., Irwin, D. (1994). Make team members responsible for team effectiveness. Cost and Management, 68 (8), 28. Salas, E., Dickinson, T., Converse, S. A., & Tannenbaum, S. I. (1992). Towards an understanding of team performance and training. In R. W. Sweezey & E. Salas (Eds.). Teams: Their training and performance. Norwood, NJ: Ablex. 219-245. Salazar, A. J. (1996). Ambiguity and communication effects on small group decision-making performance. Human Communication Research, 23 (2), 155 -192.
  29. Shannan, P. (2001). Mapping team performance shaping factors. QinetiQ, Fort Halstead. Shaw, J. B., Barret-Power, E. (1998). The effects of diversity on small work group processes and performance. Human Relations, 51 (10), 1307-1326. Sidler, G., Lifton, H. (1999). The Steps to Developing and Maintaining Effective Work Teams. Forum, 200, 17-20. Stevens, M. J., Campion, M. A. (1994). The knowledge, skills and ability requirements for teamwork: Implications for Human Resource Management. Journal of Management, 20 (2), 503 – 530. Swezey, R.W. and Salas, E. (1992). Guidelines for use in team-training development, in Swezey, R.W. and Salas, E. (Eds), Teams: Their Training and Performance. Westport, CT: Ablex Publishing Corporation. 219-45.
  30. Tannebanm, S. I., Beard, R. L., & Salas, E. (1992). Team building and its influence on team effectiveness: An examination of conceptual and empirical developments. In K. Kelly (Ed.), Issues, theory, and research in industrial/organizational psychology. New York: Elsevier Science, 117-153. Thompson, D. E., Gooler, L. E. (1996). Capitalizing on the benefits of diversity through workteams: Managing Diversity. Kossek, E.E. and Lobel, S.A. (Eds.). Cambridge: Blackwell Inc. 392 – 437. Tost, L. P., Gino, F., Larrick, R. P. (2011). When power makes others speechless: The negative impact of leader power on team performance. Harvard Business School Working Papers No. 11 – 087. Tyson, T. (1989), Working with Groups. Melbourne: MacMillan.
  31. Tyson, T. (1989), Working with Groups. Melbourne: MacMillan.
  32. Webber, S. S. (2002). Leadership and trust facilitating cross-functional team success. Journal of Management Development, 21 (3), 201-214
  33. West, M. A., Hirst, G., Richter, A., & Shipton, H. (2004): Twelve steps to heaven: Successfully managing change through developing innovative teams. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 13 (2), 269 – 299.
  34. Woodside, A. G. (2010). Case study research: theory, methods, practice. UK: Emerald Group Publishing.

Article Post Production

Article Indexed In

Comments :
Enter Name :
Email ID :
Comments :

Previous Comments :
Creative Commons License
Indian Streams Research Journal by Laxmi Book Publication is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Based on a work at http://oldisrj.lbp.world/Default.aspx.
Permissions beyond the scope of this license may be available at http://oldisrj.lbp.world/Default.aspx
Copyright © 2014 Indian Streams Research Journal. All rights reserved
Looking for information? Browse our FAQs, tour our sitemap, or contact ISRJ
Read our Privacy Policy Statement and Plagairism Policy. Use of this site signifies your agreement to the Terms of Use