|
Volume : II, Issue : X, November - 2012 THE PARAMETERS FOR DEVELOPING E CONTENT R. KRISHNAKUMAR AND C. PANNEERSELVAM DOI : 10.9780/22307850, Published By : Laxmi Book Publication Abstract : Educational learning materials that have been effectively designed will
facilitate the achievement of desired learning outcomes for students. Effective design of
E content materials relies on instructional design processes that reflect the absence of or
reduction in face-to-face instruction. It involves deep knowledge of cutting edge domains
and technologies. Developing an appropriate E content material which facilitates
independent learning and to learn in the absence of teacher involves certain parameters
which are in line with learning theories and the apt method of producing the electronic
material. Those parameters which are essential for the development of the proper e
content are outlined in this paper. Keywords : Article : Cite This Article : R. KRISHNAKUMAR AND C. PANNEERSELVAM, (2012). THE PARAMETERS FOR DEVELOPING E CONTENT. Indian Streams Research Journal, Vol. II, Issue. X, DOI : 10.9780/22307850, http://oldisrj.lbp.world/UploadedData/1662.pdf References : - Bordens, K.S. and Abbott, B.B. (1996) Research Design and Methods: A Process Approach. 3rd ed. Mountain View, CA: Mayfield
- Brenda Mergel. May, (1998) Instructional Design & Learning Theory:, Educational Communications and Technology, University of Saskatchewan.
- Blinco, K. (2004) Trends and issues in E-learning infrastructure development.http://www.jisc.ac.uk/uploaded_documents/Altilab04-infrastructureV2.pdf
- Bonk, C. (2002). Research related to the effectiveness of E-learning and collaborative tools. http://www.trainingshare.com/download/australia/TAFE_sydney/tools.ppt
- Cappelli, G. (2003). E-learning in the postsecondary education market: A view from Wall Street. In N. Pittinsky (Ed.).The Wired Tower: Perspectives on the Impact of the Internet on Higher Education. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Financial Times/Prentice Hall, Pearson Education Inc.
- Clark, R. & Mayer, R. (2003).E-learning and the Science of Instruction. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons.
- Clark, R.C. and Mayer, R.E. (2002).E-learning and the Science of Instruction: Proven Guidelines for Consumers and Designers of Multimedia Learning.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Pfeif
- Downes, S. (1998). The future of online learning.http://www.atl.ualberta.ca/downes/future
- Figueira, E. (2003). Evaluating the effectiveness of E-learning strategies for SMEs.http://www.theknownet.com/ict_smes_seminars/papers/Figueira.html
- Gagne, R. (1985). The Conditions of Learning (4th ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston
- Kurse, K. (2004b). The magic of learner motivation: The ARCS model. http://www.Elearningguru. com/articles/art3_5.htm
- Merrill, M.D. (1997). Instructional strategies that teach.CBT Solutions, November/December, 1-5.
- Mohamed, A. (2004). Foundations of educational theory for online learning.In T. Anderson & F. Elloumi (Eds.).Theory and Practice of Online Learning, AB, Canada: Athabasca University. http://cde.athabascau.ca/online_book/
- Schank, R. (2002). Designing World-Class E-learning.New York, USA: McGraw-Hill.
- Shaw, K. (2001). Designing learning opportunities, orchestrating experiences and managing learning.In J. Stephenson (Ed.).Teaching Online & Learning online: Pedagogies for New Technologies, (pp.175-181). London: Kogan Page Limited.
- Sonwalkar, N. (2001). A New Methodology for Evaluation: The Pedagogical Rating of Online Courses, Syllabus. http://www.syllabus.com/article.asp?id=5914
- Sweller, J. (1994). Cognitive load theory, learning difficulty and instructional design. Learning and Instruction, 4, 295-312.
- Thalheimer, W. (2003).E-learning and blended learning: secrets from the learning research. http://www.work-learning.com/article_Blended_E-learning_Secrets.pdf
- Welch, J. & Byrne, J. (2001). Jack: Straight from the Gut. USA: Warner
- Whitlock, Q. (2001) Course design for online learning – what's gone wrong.In J. Stephenson (Ed.).Teaching Online & Learning Online: Pedagogies for New Technologies, (pp.182-191). London: Kogan Page Limited.
- Wright, C. (2004). Criteria for evaluation the quality of online courses. http://www.imd.macewan.ca/imd/content.php?contentid=36
|
Article Post Production
Article Indexed In
|