Indian Streams Research Journal's
Search :
News Details :
Delhi High Court Seeks Response From Education Ministry Over St Stephen's Constitution
published on : 12-24-2015
Category : University Grant Commission
NEW DELHI: The Delhi High Court on Wednesday sought response from the Ministry of Human Resource Development and University Grants Commission to a plea against the move by St Stephen's College governing body to amend its constitution for greater control of Church of North India over the institution. A bench of Justice Rajiv Shakdher also issued notice to the Delhi University, St Stephen's College, its Governing Body, Principal Valson Thampu, Chairman and Vice Chairman of the college on a plea challenging the November 30 decision of the governing body. "The matter needs consideration. Notice will be issued to all the respondents (Eight)," the court said, adding that all of them will file their replies before April 1. The court also made it clear that from here onwards, if any decision is taken by the governing body, it will be the subject to the final outcome of the writ petition pending for consideration. The court was hearing a petition filed by 21 teachers of the college, who have in their plea alleged that amending of St Stephens' constitution would result in "completely altering its basic structure and character without the consent of the Delhi University (DU)". They, through their counsel Sunil Mathew, claimed that such a step would lead to "jeopardizing the very status of the college as an affiliated and recognized institution". "Respondents 4 to 6 (Principal, Chairman and Vice Chairman of St Stephens) have mischievously sought to amend the constitution of the college thereby increasing the control of the Church of North India over the college and thereby giving controlling interest to Respondent 4 (Valson Thampu) after his retirement in February 2016," the petition said. The counsel for the institution opposed the plea, saying the petition was premature and that there was no violation on its part. The petitioner, however, alleged that "amendment process is tainted by a malicious objective of securing control of the college to persons such as Respondents 5 to 6 (Chairman of St Stephen's, Warris Massih and Vice Chairman of St Stephen's Alwan Massih) who themselves are currently illegally on the governing body and aims to cover up their illegal memberships and functioning in respect of the college." The teachers have sought quashing and setting aside of the November 30 decision of the governing body.
Related Keywords :
Stephen's Constitution Human Resource Development High Court