DOI Prefix : 10.9780 | Journal DOI : 10.9780/22307850
Scroll to Top

Volume : V, Issue : V, June - 2015

THE CONSTITUTIONAL GOVERNANCE - HUMAN RIGHTS

Udaykumar, None

DOI : 10.9780/22307850, By : Laxmi Book Publication

Abstract :

Notwithstanding its short comings, the human rights discourse has become a powerful tool for enforcing accountability in governance in India. Human rights have not only expanded vertically to ensure their protection and promotion during the interaction of states with all actors but also developed horizontally, becoming the basis for good governance and interaction even among the citizenry. Human rights have come to acquire a certain degree of legitimacy in the interaction of states in the international arena, an example of which may be the universally recognized right to freedom from torture

Keywords :


Article :


Cite This Article :

Udaykumar, None(2015). THE CONSTITUTIONAL GOVERNANCE - HUMAN RIGHTS . Indian Streams Research Journal, Vol. V, Issue. V, DOI : 10.9780/22307850, http://isrj.org/UploadedData/6751.pdf

References :

  1. B.L.Grover: A Documentary Study of British Policy Towards Indian Nationalism, p.11.
  2. In Marxist parlance, the congress was dominated by the progressive bourgeois-landlord-rich farmer combine and its ideological representatives, the educated middle class.
  3. Lajpat Rai: Young India, p.156.
  4. Philip Woodruff: The Men who Ruled India, Vol.ii, P.176.
  5. B.L.Grover: A Documentary Study of British Policy Towards Indian Nationalism, p.11.
  6. In Marxist parlance, the congress was dominated by the progressive bourgeois-landlord-rich farmer combine and its ideological representatives, the educated middle class.
  7. Lajpat Rai: Young India, p.156.
  8. Philip Woodruff: The Men who Ruled India, Vol.ii, P.176.
  9. While in England in 1897 Gokhale wrote a letter to the Machester Guardian on 2 July 1897 condemning the behaviour of Plague commissioners at Poona.
  10. Quoted in M.R.Palande (ed)., Source Material for a History of the Freedom Movement in India, Vol.ii, pp.848-9.
  11. B.L.Grover: A Documentary Study of British Policy Towards Indian Nationalism, p.11.
  12. In Marxist parlance, the congress was dominated by the progressive bourgeois-landlord-rich farmer combine and its ideological representatives, the educated middle class.
  13. Lajpat Rai: Young India, p.156.
  14. Philip Woodruff: The Men who Ruled India, Vol.ii, P.176.
  15. B.L.Grover: A Documentary Study of British Policy Towards Indian Nationalism, p.11.
  16. In Marxist parlance, the congress was dominated by the progressive bourgeois-landlord-rich farmer combine and its ideological representatives, the educated middle class.
  17. Lajpat Rai: Young India, p.156.
  18. Philip Woodruff: The Men who Ruled India, Vol.ii, P.176.
  19. While in England in 1897 Gokhale wrote a letter to the Machester Guardian on 2 July 1897 condemning the behaviour of Plague commissioners at Poona.
  20. Quoted in M.R.Palande (ed)., Source Material for a History of the Freedom Movement in India, Vol.ii, pp.848-9.
  21. Quoted in M.R.Palande (ed)., Source Material for a History of the Freedom Movement in India, Vol.ii, pp.848-9.
  22. Quoted in M.R.Palande (ed)., Source Material for a History of the Freedom Movement in India, Vol.ii, pp.848-9.
  23. B.L.Grover: A Documentary Study of British Policy Towards Indian Nationalism, p.11.
  24. In Marxist parlance, the congress was dominated by the progressive bourgeois-landlord-rich farmer combine and its ideological representatives, the educated middle class.
  25. Lajpat Rai: Young India, p.156.
  26. Philip Woodruff: The Men who Ruled India, Vol.ii, P.176.
  27. While in England in 1897 Gokhale wrote a letter to the Machester Guardian on 2 July 1897 condemning the behaviour of Plague commissioners at Poona.
  28. B.L.Grover: A Documentary Study of British Policy Towards Indian Nationalism, p.11.
  29. In Marxist parlance, the congress was dominated by the progressive bourgeois-landlord-rich farmer combine and its ideological representatives, the educated middle class.
  30. Lajpat Rai: Young India, p.156.
  31. Philip Woodruff: The Men who Ruled India, Vol.ii, P.176.
  32. While in England in 1897 Gokhale wrote a letter to the Machester Guardian on 2 July 1897 condemning the behaviour of Plague commissioners at Poona.
  33. While in England in 1897 Gokhale wrote a letter to the Machester Guardian on 2 July 1897 condemning the behaviour of Plague commissioners at Poona.
  34. B.L.Grover: A Documentary Study of British Policy Towards Indian Nationalism, p.11.
  35. In Marxist parlance, the congress was dominated by the progressive bourgeois-landlord-rich farmer combine and its ideological representatives, the educated middle class.
  36. Lajpat Rai: Young India, p.156.
  37. Philip Woodruff: The Men who Ruled India, Vol.ii, P.176.
  38. While in England in 1897 Gokhale wrote a letter to the Machester Guardian on 2 July 1897 condemning the behaviour of Plague commissioners at Poona.
  39. B.L.Grover: A Documentary Study of British Policy Towards Indian Nationalism, p.11.
  40. In Marxist parlance, the congress was dominated by the progressive bourgeois-landlord-rich farmer combine and its ideological representatives, the educated middle class.
  41. Lajpat Rai: Young India, p.156.
  42. Philip Woodruff: The Men who Ruled India, Vol.ii, P.176.
  43. While in England in 1897 Gokhale wrote a letter to the Machester Guardian on 2 July 1897 condemning the behaviour of Plague commissioners at Poona.
  44. B.L.Grover: A Documentary Study of British Policy Towards Indian Nationalism, p.11.
  45. In Marxist parlance, the congress was dominated by the progressive bourgeois-landlord-rich farmer combine and its ideological representatives, the educated middle class.
  46. Lajpat Rai: Young India, p.156.
  47. Philip Woodruff: The Men who Ruled India, Vol.ii, P.176.
  48. While in England in 1897 Gokhale wrote a letter to the Machester Guardian on 2 July 1897 condemning the behaviour of Plague commissioners at Poona.
  49. Quoted in M.R.Palande (ed)., Source Material for a History of the Freedom Movement in India, Vol.ii, pp.848-9.
  50. Quoted in M.R.Palande (ed)., Source Material for a History of the Freedom Movement in India, Vol.ii, pp.848-9.
  51. Quoted in M.R.Palande (ed)., Source Material for a History of the Freedom Movement in India, Vol.ii, pp.848-9.
  52. Quoted in M.R.Palande (ed)., Source Material for a History of the Freedom Movement in India, Vol.ii, pp.848-9.
  53. Quoted in M.R.Palande (ed)., Source Material for a History of the Freedom Movement in India, Vol.ii, pp.848-9.
  54. B.L.Grover: A Documentary Study of British Policy Towards Indian Nationalism, p.11.
  55. In Marxist parlance, the congress was dominated by the progressive bourgeois-landlord-rich farmer combine and its ideological representatives, the educated middle class.
  56. Lajpat Rai: Young India, p.156.
  57. Philip Woodruff: The Men who Ruled India, Vol.ii, P.176.
  58. While in England in 1897 Gokhale wrote a letter to the Machester Guardian on 2 July 1897 condemning the behaviour of Plague commissioners at Poona.
  59. B.L.Grover: A Documentary Study of British Policy Towards Indian Nationalism, p.11.
  60. In Marxist parlance, the congress was dominated by the progressive bourgeois-landlord-rich farmer combine and its ideological representatives, the educated middle class.
  61. Lajpat Rai: Young India, p.156.
  62. Philip Woodruff: The Men who Ruled India, Vol.ii, P.176.
  63. While in England in 1897 Gokhale wrote a letter to the Machester Guardian on 2 July 1897 condemning the behaviour of Plague commissioners at Poona.
  64. In Marxist parlance, the congress was dominated by the progressive bourgeois-landlord-rich farmer combine and its ideological representatives, the educated middle class.
  65. Lajpat Rai: Young India, p.156.
  66. Philip Woodruff: The Men who Ruled India, Vol.ii, P.176.
  67. While in England in 1897 Gokhale wrote a letter to the Machester Guardian on 2 July 1897 condemning the behaviour of Plague commissioners at Poona.
  68. B.L.Grover: A Documentary Study of British Policy Towards Indian Nationalism, p.11.
  69. In Marxist parlance, the congress was dominated by the progressive bourgeois-landlord-rich farmer combine and its ideological representatives, the educated middle class.
  70. Lajpat Rai: Young India, p.156.
  71. Philip Woodruff: The Men who Ruled India, Vol.ii, P.176.
  72. While in England in 1897 Gokhale wrote a letter to the Machester Guardian on 2 July 1897 condemning the behaviour of Plague commissioners at Poona.
  73. Quoted in M.R.Palande (ed)., Source Material for a History of the Freedom Movement in India, Vol.ii, pp.848-9.
  74. Philip Woodruff: The Men who Ruled India, Vol.ii, P.176.
  75. While in England in 1897 Gokhale wrote a letter to the Machester Guardian on 2 July 1897 condemning the behaviour of Plague commissioners at Poona.
  76. B.L.Grover: A Documentary Study of British Policy Towards Indian Nationalism, p.11.
  77. B.L.Grover: A Documentary Study of British Policy Towards Indian Nationalism, p.11.
  78. In Marxist parlance, the congress was dominated by the progressive bourgeois-landlord-rich farmer combine and its ideological representatives, the educated middle class.
  79. Lajpat Rai: Young India, p.156.
  80. B.L.Grover: A Documentary Study of British Policy Towards Indian Nationalism, p.11.
  81. In Marxist parlance, the congress was dominated by the progressive bourgeois-landlord-rich farmer combine and its ideological representatives, the educated middle class.
  82. Lajpat Rai: Young India, p.156.
  83. While in England in 1897 Gokhale wrote a letter to the Machester Guardian on 2 July 1897 condemning the behaviour of Plague commissioners at Poona.
  84. B.L.Grover: A Documentary Study of British Policy Towards Indian Nationalism, p.11.
  85. In Marxist parlance, the congress was dominated by the progressive bourgeois-landlord-rich farmer combine and its ideological representatives, the educated middle class.
  86. Lajpat Rai: Young India, p.156.
  87. Philip Woodruff: The Men who Ruled India, Vol.ii, P.176.
  88. Quoted in M.R.Palande (ed)., Source Material for a History of the Freedom Movement in India, Vol.ii, pp.848-9.
  89. Philip Woodruff: The Men who Ruled India, Vol.ii, P.176.
  90. While in England in 1897 Gokhale wrote a letter to the Machester Guardian on 2 July 1897 condemning the behaviour of Plague commissioners at Poona.
  91. Quoted in M.R.Palande (ed)., Source Material for a History of the Freedom Movement in India, Vol.ii, pp.848-9.
  92. B.L.Grover: A Documentary Study of British Policy Towards Indian Nationalism, p.11.
  93. In Marxist parlance, the congress was dominated by the progressive bourgeois-landlord-rich farmer combine and its ideological representatives, the educated middle class.
  94. Lajpat Rai: Young India, p.156.
  95. Philip Woodruff: The Men who Ruled India, Vol.ii, P.176.
  96. While in England in 1897 Gokhale wrote a letter to the Machester Guardian on 2 July 1897 condemning the behaviour of Plague commissioners at Poona.
  97. Quoted in M.R.Palande (ed)., Source Material for a History of the Freedom Movement in India, Vol.ii, pp.848-9.
  98. B.L.Grover: A Documentary Study of British Policy Towards Indian Nationalism, p.11.
  99. In Marxist parlance, the congress was dominated by the progressive bourgeois-landlord-rich farmer combine and its ideological representatives, the educated middle class.
  100. Lajpat Rai: Young India, p.156.
  101. Philip Woodruff: The Men who Ruled India, Vol.ii, P.176.
  102. Quoted in M.R.Palande (ed)., Source Material for a History of the Freedom Movement in India, Vol.ii, pp.848-9.
  103. B.L.Grover: A Documentary Study of British Policy Towards Indian Nationalism, p.11.
  104. In Marxist parlance, the congress was dominated by the progressive bourgeois-landlord-rich farmer combine and its ideological representatives, the educated middle class.
  105. Lajpat Rai: Young India, p.156.
  106. Philip Woodruff: The Men who Ruled India, Vol.ii, P.176.
  107. While in England in 1897 Gokhale wrote a letter to the Machester Guardian on 2 July 1897 condemning the behaviour of Plague commissioners at Poona.
  108. Quoted in M.R.Palande (ed)., Source Material for a History of the Freedom Movement in India, Vol.ii, pp.848-9.
  109. Quoted in M.R.Palande (ed)., Source Material for a History of the Freedom Movement in India, Vol.ii, pp.848-9.
  110. Quoted in M.R.Palande (ed)., Source Material for a History of the Freedom Movement in India, Vol.ii, pp.848-9.
  111. B.L.Grover: A Documentary Study of British Policy Towards Indian Nationalism, p.11.
  112. In Marxist parlance, the congress was dominated by the progressive bourgeois-landlord-rich farmer combine and its ideological representatives, the educated middle class.
  113. Lajpat Rai: Young India, p.156.
  114. Philip Woodruff: The Men who Ruled India, Vol.ii, P.176.
  115. While in England in 1897 Gokhale wrote a letter to the Machester Guardian on 2 July 1897 condemning the behaviour of Plague commissioners at Poona.
  116. While in England in 1897 Gokhale wrote a letter to the Machester Guardian on 2 July 1897 condemning the behaviour of Plague commissioners at Poona.
  117. Quoted in M.R.Palande (ed)., Source Material for a History of the Freedom Movement in India, Vol.ii, pp.848-9.
  118. In Marxist parlance, the congress was dominated by the progressive bourgeois-landlord-rich farmer combine and its ideological representatives, the educated middle class.
  119. Lajpat Rai: Young India, p.156.
  120. Philip Woodruff: The Men who Ruled India, Vol.ii, P.176.
  121. While in England in 1897 Gokhale wrote a letter to the Machester Guardian on 2 July 1897 condemning the behaviour of Plague commissioners at Poona.
  122. Quoted in M.R.Palande (ed)., Source Material for a History of the Freedom Movement in India, Vol.ii, pp.848-9.
  123. B.L.Grover: A Documentary Study of British Policy Towards Indian Nationalism, p.11.
  124. In Marxist parlance, the congress was dominated by the progressive bourgeois-landlord-rich farmer combine and its ideological representatives, the educated middle class.
  125. Lajpat Rai: Young India, p.156.
  126. Philip Woodruff: The Men who Ruled India, Vol.ii, P.176.
  127. B.L.Grover: A Documentary Study of British Policy Towards Indian Nationalism, p.11.
  128. In Marxist parlance, the congress was dominated by the progressive bourgeois-landlord-rich farmer combine and its ideological representatives, the educated middle class.
  129. Lajpat Rai: Young India, p.156.
  130. Philip Woodruff: The Men who Ruled India, Vol.ii, P.176.
  131. While in England in 1897 Gokhale wrote a letter to the Machester Guardian on 2 July 1897 condemning the behaviour of Plague commissioners at Poona.
  132. B.L.Grover: A Documentary Study of British Policy Towards Indian Nationalism, p.11.
  133. B.L.Grover: A Documentary Study of British Policy Towards Indian Nationalism, p.11.
  134. In Marxist parlance, the congress was dominated by the progressive bourgeois-landlord-rich farmer combine and its ideological representatives, the educated middle class.
  135. Lajpat Rai: Young India, p.156.
  136. Philip Woodruff: The Men who Ruled India, Vol.ii, P.176.
  137. While in England in 1897 Gokhale wrote a letter to the Machester Guardian on 2 July 1897 condemning the behaviour of Plague commissioners at Poona.
  138. While in England in 1897 Gokhale wrote a letter to the Machester Guardian on 2 July 1897 condemning the behaviour of Plague commissioners at Poona.
  139. B.L.Grover: A Documentary Study of British Policy Towards Indian Nationalism, p.11.
  140. In Marxist parlance, the congress was dominated by the progressive bourgeois-landlord-rich farmer combine and its ideological representatives, the educated middle class.
  141. Lajpat Rai: Young India, p.156.
  142. Philip Woodruff: The Men who Ruled India, Vol.ii, P.176.
  143. While in England in 1897 Gokhale wrote a letter to the Machester Guardian on 2 July 1897 condemning the behaviour of Plague commissioners at Poona.
  144. Quoted in M.R.Palande (ed)., Source Material for a History of the Freedom Movement in India, Vol.ii, pp.848-9.

Article Post Production

    No data exists for the row/column.
Creative Commons License
Indian Streams Research Journal by Laxmi Book Publication is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Based on a work at http://oldisrj.lbp.world/Default.aspx.
Permissions beyond the scope of this license may be available at http://oldisrj.lbp.world/Default.aspx
Copyright © 2014 Indian Streams Research Journal. All rights reserved
Looking for information? Browse our FAQs, tour our sitemap, or contact ISRJ
Read our Privacy Policy Statement and Plagairism Policy. Use of this site signifies your agreement to the Terms of Use