DOI Prefix : 10.9780 | Journal DOI : 10.9780/22307850
Scroll to Top

Volume : IV, Issue : I, February - 2014

MADRAS LEGISLATIVE DEBATE OVER “THE WHITE PAPER” ON PANCHAYAT ADMINISTRATION

R. Kumaran, -

DOI : 10.9780/22307850, By : Laxmi Book Publication

Abstract :

The White Paper placed before the Madras Legislature on 29th September 1956 could not be discussed before the legislature was dissolved on 25th October 1956. Parliamentary and State elections intervened in early 1957. After the new ministry assumed office , a cabinet commit was appointed to consider the future of local administration. It presented a revised provisional conclusions in the shape of another White Paper in October 1957. It set out a five-year programme commencing from 1957 -1958 for complete coverage of the state with panchayats constituted under the Madras Village Panchayats Act of 1950 , and aimed at improving the efficiency of panchayat administration , and reducing the evil of factions in the panchayat organisation

Keywords :


Article :


Cite This Article :

R. Kumaran, -(2014). MADRAS LEGISLATIVE DEBATE OVER “THE WHITE PAPER” ON PANCHAYAT ADMINISTRATION. Indian Streams Research Journal, Vol. IV, Issue. I, DOI : 10.9780/22307850, http://isrj.org/UploadedData/4209.pdf

References :

  1. Ibid., pp. 263-265.
  2. Madras Legislative Council Debates, Vol.XXVIII, 1958, pp.30-37.
  3. Ibid., pp. 263-265.
  4. Madras Legislative Council Debates, Vol.XXVIII, 1958, pp.30-37.
  5. of a subordinate branch of the revenue department and would lead to administrative difficulties.
  6. of a subordinate branch of the revenue department and would lead to administrative difficulties.
  7. Ibid.,pp.261-268.
  8. The members of the committee were V.K, Palaniswami Gounder, Jothi Venkatachalam. S.P. Sivasubramania Nadar, A.
  9. Singaraavel, A., Ullatchi, (Tamil), Tiruchirappalli, 2008, p.28.
  10. of a subordinate branch of the revenue department and would lead to administrative difficulties.
  11. Pillay, K.K., History of Local Self- Government in the Madras Presidency, 1850-1919, Chunilal D. Barfivala, Bombay,
  12. 1953, p.i.
  13. Madras Legislative Assembly Debates , Vol.VI, 1957, pp.165-170 and 247-258.
  14. Ibid.,pp.261-268.
  15. members S. Ramaswami Naidu, K. Vinayakam and A.A. Rasheed
  16. Ibid., pp. 263-265.
  17. Madras Legislative Council Debates, Vol.XXVIII, 1958, pp.30-37.
  18. Gajapathy Nayagar, M.V. Sudarsanam Naidu, V.V. Ramaswami, Mohamed Raza Khan, and . V.K. John.
  19. members S. Ramaswami Naidu, K. Vinayakam and A.A. Rasheed
  20. members S. Ramaswami Naidu, K. Vinayakam and A.A. Rasheed
  21. Ibid., Vol. XXI, 1951, p. 250. It was quoted by T. Purushotham that the inspector of local boards and the head of the
  22. Proceedings and Connected Papers of the Legislature Committee on Local Administration, Part . III, 1958, p. 2. The three
  23. Ibid., pp. 263-265.
  24. Madras Legislative Council Debates, Vol.XXVIII, 1958, pp.30-37.
  25. Gajapathy Nayagar, M.V. Sudarsanam Naidu, V.V. Ramaswami, Mohamed Raza Khan, and . V.K. John.
  26. department had observed that in course of time, the scheme would relegate the panchayats and panchayat unions to the position
  27. members S. Ramaswami Naidu, K. Vinayakam and A.A. Rasheed
  28. members S. Ramaswami Naidu, K. Vinayakam and A.A. Rasheed
  29. The members of the committee were V.K, Palaniswami Gounder, Jothi Venkatachalam. S.P. Sivasubramania Nadar, A.
  30. Singaraavel, A., Ullatchi, (Tamil), Tiruchirappalli, 2008, p.28.
  31. Ibid., Vol. XXI, 1951, p. 250. It was quoted by T. Purushotham that the inspector of local boards and the head of the
  32. Proceedings and Connected Papers of the Legislature Committee on Local Administration, Part . III, 1958, p. 2. The three
  33. The members of the committee were V.K, Palaniswami Gounder, Jothi Venkatachalam. S.P. Sivasubramania Nadar, A.
  34. Singaraavel, A., Ullatchi, (Tamil), Tiruchirappalli, 2008, p.28.
  35. Ibid., Vol. XXI, 1951, p. 250. It was quoted by T. Purushotham that the inspector of local boards and the head of the
  36. Proceedings and Connected Papers of the Legislature Committee on Local Administration, Part . III, 1958, p. 2. The three
  37. Ibid., pp. 263-265.
  38. Madras Legislative Council Debates, Vol.XXVIII, 1958, pp.30-37.
  39. Ibid., Vol. XXI, 1951, p. 250. It was quoted by T. Purushotham that the inspector of local boards and the head of the
  40. Proceedings and Connected Papers of the Legislature Committee on Local Administration, Part . III, 1958, p. 2. The three
  41. The members of the committee were V.K, Palaniswami Gounder, Jothi Venkatachalam. S.P. Sivasubramania Nadar, A.
  42. Ibid.,pp.261-268.
  43. Ibid., Vol. XXI, 1951, p. 250. It was quoted by T. Purushotham that the inspector of local boards and the head of the
  44. Proceedings and Connected Papers of the Legislature Committee on Local Administration, Part . III, 1958, p. 2. The three
  45. Ibid., pp. 263-265.
  46. Madras Legislative Council Debates, Vol.XXVIII, 1958, pp.30-37.
  47. of a subordinate branch of the revenue department and would lead to administrative difficulties.
  48. Singaraavel, A., Ullatchi, (Tamil), Tiruchirappalli, 2008, p.28.
  49. department had observed that in course of time, the scheme would relegate the panchayats and panchayat unions to the position
  50. department had observed that in course of time, the scheme would relegate the panchayats and panchayat unions to the position
  51. members S. Ramaswami Naidu, K. Vinayakam and A.A. Rasheed
  52. Ibid., Vol. XXI, 1951, p. 250. It was quoted by T. Purushotham that the inspector of local boards and the head of the
  53. Proceedings and Connected Papers of the Legislature Committee on Local Administration, Part . III, 1958, p. 2. The three
  54. of a subordinate branch of the revenue department and would lead to administrative difficulties.
  55. department had observed that in course of time, the scheme would relegate the panchayats and panchayat unions to the position
  56. Ibid., pp. 263-265.
  57. Madras Legislative Council Debates, Vol.XXVIII, 1958, pp.30-37.
  58. Ibid., pp. 263-265.
  59. Ibid., pp. 263-265.
  60. Madras Legislative Council Debates, Vol.XXVIII, 1958, pp.30-37.
  61. members S. Ramaswami Naidu, K. Vinayakam and A.A. Rasheed
  62. Pillay, K.K., History of Local Self- Government in the Madras Presidency, 1850-1919, Chunilal D. Barfivala, Bombay,
  63. 1953, p.i.
  64. Ibid.,pp.261-268.
  65. Gajapathy Nayagar, M.V. Sudarsanam Naidu, V.V. Ramaswami, Mohamed Raza Khan, and . V.K. John.
  66. of a subordinate branch of the revenue department and would lead to administrative difficulties.
  67. Madras Legislative Council Debates, Vol.XXVIII, 1958, pp.30-37.
  68. Madras Legislative Assembly Debates , Vol.VI, 1957, pp.165-170 and 247-258.
  69. Pillay, K.K., History of Local Self- Government in the Madras Presidency, 1850-1919, Chunilal D. Barfivala, Bombay,
  70. 1953, p.i.
  71. members S. Ramaswami Naidu, K. Vinayakam and A.A. Rasheed
  72. Ibid., pp. 263-265.
  73. Madras Legislative Council Debates, Vol.XXVIII, 1958, pp.30-37.
  74. members S. Ramaswami Naidu, K. Vinayakam and A.A. Rasheed
  75. The members of the committee were V.K, Palaniswami Gounder, Jothi Venkatachalam. S.P. Sivasubramania Nadar, A.
  76. Singaraavel, A., Ullatchi, (Tamil), Tiruchirappalli, 2008, p.28.
  77. Ibid., pp. 263-265.
  78. Madras Legislative Council Debates, Vol.XXVIII, 1958, pp.30-37.
  79. Ibid.,pp.261-268.
  80. members S. Ramaswami Naidu, K. Vinayakam and A.A. Rasheed
  81. Gajapathy Nayagar, M.V. Sudarsanam Naidu, V.V. Ramaswami, Mohamed Raza Khan, and . V.K. John.
  82. Madras Legislative Assembly Debates , Vol.VI, 1957, pp.165-170 and 247-258.
  83. members S. Ramaswami Naidu, K. Vinayakam and A.A. Rasheed
  84. members S. Ramaswami Naidu, K. Vinayakam and A.A. Rasheed
  85. Madras Legislative Assembly Debates , Vol.VI, 1957, pp.165-170 and 247-258.
  86. The members of the committee were V.K, Palaniswami Gounder, Jothi Venkatachalam. S.P. Sivasubramania Nadar, A.
  87. Singaraavel, A., Ullatchi, (Tamil), Tiruchirappalli, 2008, p.28.
  88. Singaraavel, A., Ullatchi, (Tamil), Tiruchirappalli, 2008, p.28.
  89. Ibid., pp. 263-265.
  90. Madras Legislative Council Debates, Vol.XXVIII, 1958, pp.30-37.
  91. members S. Ramaswami Naidu, K. Vinayakam and A.A. Rasheed
  92. The members of the committee were V.K, Palaniswami Gounder, Jothi Venkatachalam. S.P. Sivasubramania Nadar, A.
  93. Singaraavel, A., Ullatchi, (Tamil), Tiruchirappalli, 2008, p.28.
  94. Ibid., pp. 263-265.
  95. Madras Legislative Council Debates, Vol.XXVIII, 1958, pp.30-37.
  96. Gajapathy Nayagar, M.V. Sudarsanam Naidu, V.V. Ramaswami, Mohamed Raza Khan, and . V.K. John.
  97. The members of the committee were V.K, Palaniswami Gounder, Jothi Venkatachalam. S.P. Sivasubramania Nadar, A.
  98. members S. Ramaswami Naidu, K. Vinayakam and A.A. Rasheed
  99. department had observed that in course of time, the scheme would relegate the panchayats and panchayat unions to the position
  100. members S. Ramaswami Naidu, K. Vinayakam and A.A. Rasheed
  101. Gajapathy Nayagar, M.V. Sudarsanam Naidu, V.V. Ramaswami, Mohamed Raza Khan, and . V.K. John.
  102. Madras Legislative Assembly Debates , Vol.VI, 1957, pp.165-170 and 247-258.
  103. Gajapathy Nayagar, M.V. Sudarsanam Naidu, V.V. Ramaswami, Mohamed Raza Khan, and . V.K. John.
  104. Ibid., pp. 263-265.
  105. Madras Legislative Council Debates, Vol.XXVIII, 1958, pp.30-37.
  106. Pillay, K.K., History of Local Self- Government in the Madras Presidency, 1850-1919, Chunilal D. Barfivala, Bombay,
  107. 1953, p.i.
  108. members S. Ramaswami Naidu, K. Vinayakam and A.A. Rasheed
  109. Ibid.,pp.261-268.
  110. Madras Legislative Assembly Debates , Vol.VI, 1957, pp.165-170 and 247-258.
  111. Gajapathy Nayagar, M.V. Sudarsanam Naidu, V.V. Ramaswami, Mohamed Raza Khan, and . V.K. John.
  112. Gajapathy Nayagar, M.V. Sudarsanam Naidu, V.V. Ramaswami, Mohamed Raza Khan, and . V.K. John.
  113. Ibid.,pp.261-268.
  114. Ibid., Vol. XXI, 1951, p. 250. It was quoted by T. Purushotham that the inspector of local boards and the head of the
  115. Proceedings and Connected Papers of the Legislature Committee on Local Administration, Part . III, 1958, p. 2. The three
  116. Ibid., pp. 263-265.
  117. Madras Legislative Council Debates, Vol.XXVIII, 1958, pp.30-37.
  118. members S. Ramaswami Naidu, K. Vinayakam and A.A. Rasheed
  119. The members of the committee were V.K, Palaniswami Gounder, Jothi Venkatachalam. S.P. Sivasubramania Nadar, A.
  120. Singaraavel, A., Ullatchi, (Tamil), Tiruchirappalli, 2008, p.28.
  121. department had observed that in course of time, the scheme would relegate the panchayats and panchayat unions to the position
  122. Madras Legislative Assembly Debates , Vol.VI, 1957, pp.165-170 and 247-258.
  123. of a subordinate branch of the revenue department and would lead to administrative difficulties.
  124. of a subordinate branch of the revenue department and would lead to administrative difficulties.
  125. of a subordinate branch of the revenue department and would lead to administrative difficulties.
  126. Ibid., Vol. XXI, 1951, p. 250. It was quoted by T. Purushotham that the inspector of local boards and the head of the
  127. Proceedings and Connected Papers of the Legislature Committee on Local Administration, Part . III, 1958, p. 2. The three
  128. Ibid., pp. 263-265.
  129. Madras Legislative Council Debates, Vol.XXVIII, 1958, pp.30-37.
  130. of a subordinate branch of the revenue department and would lead to administrative difficulties.
  131. Gajapathy Nayagar, M.V. Sudarsanam Naidu, V.V. Ramaswami, Mohamed Raza Khan, and . V.K. John.
  132. members S. Ramaswami Naidu, K. Vinayakam and A.A. Rasheed
  133. Madras Legislative Assembly Debates , Vol.VI, 1957, pp.165-170 and 247-258.
  134. Singaraavel, A., Ullatchi, (Tamil), Tiruchirappalli, 2008, p.28.
  135. Gajapathy Nayagar, M.V. Sudarsanam Naidu, V.V. Ramaswami, Mohamed Raza Khan, and . V.K. John.
  136. members S. Ramaswami Naidu, K. Vinayakam and A.A. Rasheed
  137. Gajapathy Nayagar, M.V. Sudarsanam Naidu, V.V. Ramaswami, Mohamed Raza Khan, and . V.K. John.
  138. members S. Ramaswami Naidu, K. Vinayakam and A.A. Rasheed
  139. Ibid., Vol. XXI, 1951, p. 250. It was quoted by T. Purushotham that the inspector of local boards and the head of the
  140. Proceedings and Connected Papers of the Legislature Committee on Local Administration, Part . III, 1958, p. 2. The three
  141. The members of the committee were V.K, Palaniswami Gounder, Jothi Venkatachalam. S.P. Sivasubramania Nadar, A.
  142. Gajapathy Nayagar, M.V. Sudarsanam Naidu, V.V. Ramaswami, Mohamed Raza Khan, and . V.K. John.
  143. Ibid.,pp.261-268.
  144. Pillay, K.K., History of Local Self- Government in the Madras Presidency, 1850-1919, Chunilal D. Barfivala, Bombay,
  145. 1953, p.i.
  146. of a subordinate branch of the revenue department and would lead to administrative difficulties.
  147. members S. Ramaswami Naidu, K. Vinayakam and A.A. Rasheed
  148. Gajapathy Nayagar, M.V. Sudarsanam Naidu, V.V. Ramaswami, Mohamed Raza Khan, and . V.K. John.
  149. Pillay, K.K., History of Local Self- Government in the Madras Presidency, 1850-1919, Chunilal D. Barfivala, Bombay,
  150. 1953, p.i.
  151. Ibid.,pp.261-268.
  152. department had observed that in course of time, the scheme would relegate the panchayats and panchayat unions to the position
  153. The members of the committee were V.K, Palaniswami Gounder, Jothi Venkatachalam. S.P. Sivasubramania Nadar, A.
  154. Singaraavel, A., Ullatchi, (Tamil), Tiruchirappalli, 2008, p.28.
  155. department had observed that in course of time, the scheme would relegate the panchayats and panchayat unions to the position
  156. of a subordinate branch of the revenue department and would lead to administrative difficulties.
  157. Ibid., pp. 263-265.
  158. Madras Legislative Council Debates, Vol.XXVIII, 1958, pp.30-37.
  159. The members of the committee were V.K, Palaniswami Gounder, Jothi Venkatachalam. S.P. Sivasubramania Nadar, A.
  160. Singaraavel, A., Ullatchi, (Tamil), Tiruchirappalli, 2008, p.28.
  161. Madras Legislative Assembly Debates , Vol.VI, 1957, pp.165-170 and 247-258.
  162. members S. Ramaswami Naidu, K. Vinayakam and A.A. Rasheed
  163. members S. Ramaswami Naidu, K. Vinayakam and A.A. Rasheed
  164. members S. Ramaswami Naidu, K. Vinayakam and A.A. Rasheed
  165. Gajapathy Nayagar, M.V. Sudarsanam Naidu, V.V. Ramaswami, Mohamed Raza Khan, and . V.K. John.
  166. Ibid., pp. 263-265.
  167. Madras Legislative Council Debates, Vol.XXVIII, 1958, pp.30-37.
  168. Ibid., Vol. XXI, 1951, p. 250. It was quoted by T. Purushotham that the inspector of local boards and the head of the
  169. Proceedings and Connected Papers of the Legislature Committee on Local Administration, Part . III, 1958, p. 2. The three
  170. Ibid., Vol. XXI, 1951, p. 250. It was quoted by T. Purushotham that the inspector of local boards and the head of the
  171. Proceedings and Connected Papers of the Legislature Committee on Local Administration, Part . III, 1958, p. 2. The three
  172. Pillay, K.K., History of Local Self- Government in the Madras Presidency, 1850-1919, Chunilal D. Barfivala, Bombay,
  173. 1953, p.i.
  174. department had observed that in course of time, the scheme would relegate the panchayats and panchayat unions to the position
  175. Madras Legislative Assembly Debates , Vol.VI, 1957, pp.165-170 and 247-258.
  176. members S. Ramaswami Naidu, K. Vinayakam and A.A. Rasheed
  177. The members of the committee were V.K, Palaniswami Gounder, Jothi Venkatachalam. S.P. Sivasubramania Nadar, A.
  178. Singaraavel, A., Ullatchi, (Tamil), Tiruchirappalli, 2008, p.28.
  179. Pillay, K.K., History of Local Self- Government in the Madras Presidency, 1850-1919, Chunilal D. Barfivala, Bombay,
  180. 1953, p.i.
  181. department had observed that in course of time, the scheme would relegate the panchayats and panchayat unions to the position
  182. Madras Legislative Assembly Debates , Vol.VI, 1957, pp.165-170 and 247-258.
  183. of a subordinate branch of the revenue department and would lead to administrative difficulties.
  184. Ibid., pp. 263-265.
  185. Madras Legislative Council Debates, Vol.XXVIII, 1958, pp.30-37.
  186. members S. Ramaswami Naidu, K. Vinayakam and A.A. Rasheed
  187. Ibid., pp. 263-265.
  188. Madras Legislative Council Debates, Vol.XXVIII, 1958, pp.30-37.
  189. Ibid.,pp.261-268.
  190. members S. Ramaswami Naidu, K. Vinayakam and A.A. Rasheed
  191. Gajapathy Nayagar, M.V. Sudarsanam Naidu, V.V. Ramaswami, Mohamed Raza Khan, and . V.K. John.
  192. members S. Ramaswami Naidu, K. Vinayakam and A.A. Rasheed
  193. Ibid.,pp.261-268.
  194. Ibid., Vol. XXI, 1951, p. 250. It was quoted by T. Purushotham that the inspector of local boards and the head of the
  195. Proceedings and Connected Papers of the Legislature Committee on Local Administration, Part . III, 1958, p. 2. The three
  196. Ibid., Vol. XXI, 1951, p. 250. It was quoted by T. Purushotham that the inspector of local boards and the head of the
  197. Proceedings and Connected Papers of the Legislature Committee on Local Administration, Part . III, 1958, p. 2. The three
  198. members S. Ramaswami Naidu, K. Vinayakam and A.A. Rasheed
  199. department had observed that in course of time, the scheme would relegate the panchayats and panchayat unions to the position
  200. of a subordinate branch of the revenue department and would lead to administrative difficulties.
  201. Ibid.,pp.261-268.
  202. The members of the committee were V.K, Palaniswami Gounder, Jothi Venkatachalam. S.P. Sivasubramania Nadar, A.
  203. Singaraavel, A., Ullatchi, (Tamil), Tiruchirappalli, 2008, p.28.
  204. members S. Ramaswami Naidu, K. Vinayakam and A.A. Rasheed
  205. members S. Ramaswami Naidu, K. Vinayakam and A.A. Rasheed
  206. Ibid.,pp.261-268.
  207. members S. Ramaswami Naidu, K. Vinayakam and A.A. Rasheed
  208. Gajapathy Nayagar, M.V. Sudarsanam Naidu, V.V. Ramaswami, Mohamed Raza Khan, and . V.K. John.
  209. members S. Ramaswami Naidu, K. Vinayakam and A.A. Rasheed
  210. of a subordinate branch of the revenue department and would lead to administrative difficulties.
  211. Ibid., Vol. XXI, 1951, p. 250. It was quoted by T. Purushotham that the inspector of local boards and the head of the
  212. Proceedings and Connected Papers of the Legislature Committee on Local Administration, Part . III, 1958, p. 2. The three
  213. department had observed that in course of time, the scheme would relegate the panchayats and panchayat unions to the position
  214. The members of the committee were V.K, Palaniswami Gounder, Jothi Venkatachalam. S.P. Sivasubramania Nadar, A.
  215. Singaraavel, A., Ullatchi, (Tamil), Tiruchirappalli, 2008, p.28.
  216. Ibid., pp. 263-265.
  217. Madras Legislative Council Debates, Vol.XXVIII, 1958, pp.30-37.
  218. department had observed that in course of time, the scheme would relegate the panchayats and panchayat unions to the position
  219. members S. Ramaswami Naidu, K. Vinayakam and A.A. Rasheed
  220. The members of the committee were V.K, Palaniswami Gounder, Jothi Venkatachalam. S.P. Sivasubramania Nadar, A.
  221. Singaraavel, A., Ullatchi, (Tamil), Tiruchirappalli, 2008, p.28.
  222. The members of the committee were V.K, Palaniswami Gounder, Jothi Venkatachalam. S.P. Sivasubramania Nadar, A.
  223. Singaraavel, A., Ullatchi, (Tamil), Tiruchirappalli, 2008, p.28.
  224. of a subordinate branch of the revenue department and would lead to administrative difficulties.
  225. Ibid., pp. 263-265.
  226. Madras Legislative Council Debates, Vol.XXVIII, 1958, pp.30-37.
  227. members S. Ramaswami Naidu, K. Vinayakam and A.A. Rasheed
  228. Ibid., Vol. XXI, 1951, p. 250. It was quoted by T. Purushotham that the inspector of local boards and the head of the
  229. Proceedings and Connected Papers of the Legislature Committee on Local Administration, Part . III, 1958, p. 2. The three
  230. Ibid.,pp.261-268.
  231. The members of the committee were V.K, Palaniswami Gounder, Jothi Venkatachalam. S.P. Sivasubramania Nadar, A.
  232. Singaraavel, A., Ullatchi, (Tamil), Tiruchirappalli, 2008, p.28.
  233. members S. Ramaswami Naidu, K. Vinayakam and A.A. Rasheed
  234. Ibid., pp. 263-265.
  235. Madras Legislative Council Debates, Vol.XXVIII, 1958, pp.30-37.
  236. Gajapathy Nayagar, M.V. Sudarsanam Naidu, V.V. Ramaswami, Mohamed Raza Khan, and . V.K. John.
  237. department had observed that in course of time, the scheme would relegate the panchayats and panchayat unions to the position
  238. Pillay, K.K., History of Local Self- Government in the Madras Presidency, 1850-1919, Chunilal D. Barfivala, Bombay,
  239. 1953, p.i.
  240. of a subordinate branch of the revenue department and would lead to administrative difficulties.
  241. members S. Ramaswami Naidu, K. Vinayakam and A.A. Rasheed
  242. department had observed that in course of time, the scheme would relegate the panchayats and panchayat unions to the position
  243. Ibid., pp. 263-265.
  244. Madras Legislative Council Debates, Vol.XXVIII, 1958, pp.30-37.
  245. Proceedings and Connected Papers of the Legislature Committee on Local Administration, Part . III, 1958, p. 2. The three
  246. of a subordinate branch of the revenue department and would lead to administrative difficulties.
  247. Ibid., Vol. XXI, 1951, p. 250. It was quoted by T. Purushotham that the inspector of local boards and the head of the
  248. Proceedings and Connected Papers of the Legislature Committee on Local Administration, Part . III, 1958, p. 2. The three
  249. Madras Legislative Assembly Debates , Vol.VI, 1957, pp.165-170 and 247-258.
  250. members S. Ramaswami Naidu, K. Vinayakam and A.A. Rasheed
  251. department had observed that in course of time, the scheme would relegate the panchayats and panchayat unions to the position
  252. Ibid., Vol. XXI, 1951, p. 250. It was quoted by T. Purushotham that the inspector of local boards and the head of the
  253. Proceedings and Connected Papers of the Legislature Committee on Local Administration, Part . III, 1958, p. 2. The three
  254. Ibid., Vol. XXI, 1951, p. 250. It was quoted by T. Purushotham that the inspector of local boards and the head of the
  255. Ibid., pp. 263-265.
  256. Madras Legislative Council Debates, Vol.XXVIII, 1958, pp.30-37.
  257. department had observed that in course of time, the scheme would relegate the panchayats and panchayat unions to the position
  258. Madras Legislative Assembly Debates , Vol.VI, 1957, pp.165-170 and 247-258.
  259. department had observed that in course of time, the scheme would relegate the panchayats and panchayat unions to the position
  260. Pillay, K.K., History of Local Self- Government in the Madras Presidency, 1850-1919, Chunilal D. Barfivala, Bombay,
  261. 1953, p.i.
  262. Ibid., Vol. XXI, 1951, p. 250. It was quoted by T. Purushotham that the inspector of local boards and the head of the
  263. Proceedings and Connected Papers of the Legislature Committee on Local Administration, Part . III, 1958, p. 2. The three
  264. The members of the committee were V.K, Palaniswami Gounder, Jothi Venkatachalam. S.P. Sivasubramania Nadar, A.
  265. Singaraavel, A., Ullatchi, (Tamil), Tiruchirappalli, 2008, p.28.
  266. The members of the committee were V.K, Palaniswami Gounder, Jothi Venkatachalam. S.P. Sivasubramania Nadar, A.
  267. Singaraavel, A., Ullatchi, (Tamil), Tiruchirappalli, 2008, p.28.
  268. of a subordinate branch of the revenue department and would lead to administrative difficulties.
  269. members S. Ramaswami Naidu, K. Vinayakam and A.A. Rasheed
  270. Madras Legislative Assembly Debates , Vol.VI, 1957, pp.165-170 and 247-258.
  271. Ibid., Vol. XXI, 1951, p. 250. It was quoted by T. Purushotham that the inspector of local boards and the head of the
  272. Proceedings and Connected Papers of the Legislature Committee on Local Administration, Part . III, 1958, p. 2. The three
  273. Ibid., pp. 263-265.
  274. Madras Legislative Council Debates, Vol.XXVIII, 1958, pp.30-37.
  275. members S. Ramaswami Naidu, K. Vinayakam and A.A. Rasheed
  276. Madras Legislative Assembly Debates , Vol.VI, 1957, pp.165-170 and 247-258.
  277. department had observed that in course of time, the scheme would relegate the panchayats and panchayat unions to the position
  278. Ibid., Vol. XXI, 1951, p. 250. It was quoted by T. Purushotham that the inspector of local boards and the head of the
  279. Proceedings and Connected Papers of the Legislature Committee on Local Administration, Part . III, 1958, p. 2. The three
  280. members S. Ramaswami Naidu, K. Vinayakam and A.A. Rasheed
  281. Ibid.,pp.261-268.
  282. Ibid., pp. 263-265.
  283. Madras Legislative Council Debates, Vol.XXVIII, 1958, pp.30-37.
  284. Ibid., pp. 263-265.
  285. Madras Legislative Council Debates, Vol.XXVIII, 1958, pp.30-37.
  286. Madras Legislative Assembly Debates , Vol.VI, 1957, pp.165-170 and 247-258.
  287. Gajapathy Nayagar, M.V. Sudarsanam Naidu, V.V. Ramaswami, Mohamed Raza Khan, and . V.K. John.
  288. Pillay, K.K., History of Local Self- Government in the Madras Presidency, 1850-1919, Chunilal D. Barfivala, Bombay,
  289. 1953, p.i.
  290. members S. Ramaswami Naidu, K. Vinayakam and A.A. Rasheed
  291. Gajapathy Nayagar, M.V. Sudarsanam Naidu, V.V. Ramaswami, Mohamed Raza Khan, and . V.K. John.
  292. Ibid., Vol. XXI, 1951, p. 250. It was quoted by T. Purushotham that the inspector of local boards and the head of the
  293. Proceedings and Connected Papers of the Legislature Committee on Local Administration, Part . III, 1958, p. 2. The three
  294. Ibid., pp. 263-265.
  295. Madras Legislative Council Debates, Vol.XXVIII, 1958, pp.30-37.
  296. members S. Ramaswami Naidu, K. Vinayakam and A.A. Rasheed
  297. members S. Ramaswami Naidu, K. Vinayakam and A.A. Rasheed
  298. Ibid., Vol. XXI, 1951, p. 250. It was quoted by T. Purushotham that the inspector of local boards and the head of the
  299. Proceedings and Connected Papers of the Legislature Committee on Local Administration, Part . III, 1958, p. 2. The three
  300. Madras Legislative Assembly Debates , Vol.VI, 1957, pp.165-170 and 247-258.
  301. Pillay, K.K., History of Local Self- Government in the Madras Presidency, 1850-1919, Chunilal D. Barfivala, Bombay,
  302. 1953, p.i.
  303. The members of the committee were V.K, Palaniswami Gounder, Jothi Venkatachalam. S.P. Sivasubramania Nadar, A.
  304. Singaraavel, A., Ullatchi, (Tamil), Tiruchirappalli, 2008, p.28.
  305. Madras Legislative Assembly Debates , Vol.VI, 1957, pp.165-170 and 247-258.
  306. Ibid.,pp.261-268.
  307. The members of the committee were V.K, Palaniswami Gounder, Jothi Venkatachalam. S.P. Sivasubramania Nadar, A.
  308. Singaraavel, A., Ullatchi, (Tamil), Tiruchirappalli, 2008, p.28.
  309. Madras Legislative Assembly Debates , Vol.VI, 1957, pp.165-170 and 247-258.
  310. department had observed that in course of time, the scheme would relegate the panchayats and panchayat unions to the position
  311. Ibid.,pp.261-268.
  312. Ibid., pp. 263-265.
  313. Madras Legislative Council Debates, Vol.XXVIII, 1958, pp.30-37.
  314. department had observed that in course of time, the scheme would relegate the panchayats and panchayat unions to the position
  315. members S. Ramaswami Naidu, K. Vinayakam and A.A. Rasheed
  316. department had observed that in course of time, the scheme would relegate the panchayats and panchayat unions to the position
  317. members S. Ramaswami Naidu, K. Vinayakam and A.A. Rasheed
  318. of a subordinate branch of the revenue department and would lead to administrative difficulties.
  319. members S. Ramaswami Naidu, K. Vinayakam and A.A. Rasheed
  320. Ibid.,pp.261-268.
  321. Ibid., Vol. XXI, 1951, p. 250. It was quoted by T. Purushotham that the inspector of local boards and the head of the
  322. Proceedings and Connected Papers of the Legislature Committee on Local Administration, Part . III, 1958, p. 2. The three
  323. members S. Ramaswami Naidu, K. Vinayakam and A.A. Rasheed
  324. Madras Legislative Assembly Debates , Vol.VI, 1957, pp.165-170 and 247-258.
  325. members S. Ramaswami Naidu, K. Vinayakam and A.A. Rasheed
  326. members S. Ramaswami Naidu, K. Vinayakam and A.A. Rasheed
  327. Pillay, K.K., History of Local Self- Government in the Madras Presidency, 1850-1919, Chunilal D. Barfivala, Bombay,
  328. 1953, p.i.
  329. department had observed that in course of time, the scheme would relegate the panchayats and panchayat unions to the position
  330. Gajapathy Nayagar, M.V. Sudarsanam Naidu, V.V. Ramaswami, Mohamed Raza Khan, and . V.K. John.
  331. The members of the committee were V.K, Palaniswami Gounder, Jothi Venkatachalam. S.P. Sivasubramania Nadar, A.
  332. Singaraavel, A., Ullatchi, (Tamil), Tiruchirappalli, 2008, p.28.
  333. Gajapathy Nayagar, M.V. Sudarsanam Naidu, V.V. Ramaswami, Mohamed Raza Khan, and . V.K. John.
  334. Ibid.,pp.261-268.
  335. Pillay, K.K., History of Local Self- Government in the Madras Presidency, 1850-1919, Chunilal D. Barfivala, Bombay,
  336. 1953, p.i.
  337. members S. Ramaswami Naidu, K. Vinayakam and A.A. Rasheed
  338. Ibid., Vol. XXI, 1951, p. 250. It was quoted by T. Purushotham that the inspector of local boards and the head of the
  339. Proceedings and Connected Papers of the Legislature Committee on Local Administration, Part . III, 1958, p. 2. The three
  340. members S. Ramaswami Naidu, K. Vinayakam and A.A. Rasheed
  341. members S. Ramaswami Naidu, K. Vinayakam and A.A. Rasheed
  342. members S. Ramaswami Naidu, K. Vinayakam and A.A. Rasheed
  343. members S. Ramaswami Naidu, K. Vinayakam and A.A. Rasheed
  344. Gajapathy Nayagar, M.V. Sudarsanam Naidu, V.V. Ramaswami, Mohamed Raza Khan, and . V.K. John.
  345. Proceedings and Connected Papers of the Legislature Committee on Local Administration, Part . III, 1958, p. 2. The three
  346. The members of the committee were V.K, Palaniswami Gounder, Jothi Venkatachalam. S.P. Sivasubramania Nadar, A.
  347. Singaraavel, A., Ullatchi, (Tamil), Tiruchirappalli, 2008, p.28.
  348. The members of the committee were V.K, Palaniswami Gounder, Jothi Venkatachalam. S.P. Sivasubramania Nadar, A.
  349. Singaraavel, A., Ullatchi, (Tamil), Tiruchirappalli, 2008, p.28.
  350. Pillay, K.K., History of Local Self- Government in the Madras Presidency, 1850-1919, Chunilal D. Barfivala, Bombay,
  351. 1953, p.i.
  352. Ibid., Vol. XXI, 1951, p. 250. It was quoted by T. Purushotham that the inspector of local boards and the head of the
  353. Ibid., Vol. XXI, 1951, p. 250. It was quoted by T. Purushotham that the inspector of local boards and the head of the
  354. Proceedings and Connected Papers of the Legislature Committee on Local Administration, Part . III, 1958, p. 2. The three
  355. Ibid., Vol. XXI, 1951, p. 250. It was quoted by T. Purushotham that the inspector of local boards and the head of the
  356. Proceedings and Connected Papers of the Legislature Committee on Local Administration, Part . III, 1958, p. 2. The three
  357. Pillay, K.K., History of Local Self- Government in the Madras Presidency, 1850-1919, Chunilal D. Barfivala, Bombay,
  358. 1953, p.i.
  359. Ibid., pp. 263-265.
  360. Madras Legislative Council Debates, Vol.XXVIII, 1958, pp.30-37.
  361. department had observed that in course of time, the scheme would relegate the panchayats and panchayat unions to the position
  362. Madras Legislative Assembly Debates , Vol.VI, 1957, pp.165-170 and 247-258.
  363. of a subordinate branch of the revenue department and would lead to administrative difficulties.
  364. of a subordinate branch of the revenue department and would lead to administrative difficulties.
  365. members S. Ramaswami Naidu, K. Vinayakam and A.A. Rasheed
  366. Madras Legislative Assembly Debates , Vol.VI, 1957, pp.165-170 and 247-258.
  367. of a subordinate branch of the revenue department and would lead to administrative difficulties.
  368. Gajapathy Nayagar, M.V. Sudarsanam Naidu, V.V. Ramaswami, Mohamed Raza Khan, and . V.K. John.
  369. Madras Legislative Assembly Debates , Vol.VI, 1957, pp.165-170 and 247-258.
  370. members S. Ramaswami Naidu, K. Vinayakam and A.A. Rasheed
  371. Gajapathy Nayagar, M.V. Sudarsanam Naidu, V.V. Ramaswami, Mohamed Raza Khan, and . V.K. John.
  372. Ibid., Vol. XXI, 1951, p. 250. It was quoted by T. Purushotham that the inspector of local boards and the head of the
  373. Proceedings and Connected Papers of the Legislature Committee on Local Administration, Part . III, 1958, p. 2. The three
  374. members S. Ramaswami Naidu, K. Vinayakam and A.A. Rasheed
  375. members S. Ramaswami Naidu, K. Vinayakam and A.A. Rasheed
  376. Ibid.,pp.261-268.
  377. department had observed that in course of time, the scheme would relegate the panchayats and panchayat unions to the position
  378. of a subordinate branch of the revenue department and would lead to administrative difficulties.
  379. department had observed that in course of time, the scheme would relegate the panchayats and panchayat unions to the position
  380. Pillay, K.K., History of Local Self- Government in the Madras Presidency, 1850-1919, Chunilal D. Barfivala, Bombay,
  381. 1953, p.i.
  382. Pillay, K.K., History of Local Self- Government in the Madras Presidency, 1850-1919, Chunilal D. Barfivala, Bombay,
  383. 1953, p.i.
  384. Ibid., pp. 263-265.
  385. Madras Legislative Council Debates, Vol.XXVIII, 1958, pp.30-37.
  386. Madras Legislative Assembly Debates , Vol.VI, 1957, pp.165-170 and 247-258.
  387. members S. Ramaswami Naidu, K. Vinayakam and A.A. Rasheed
  388. members S. Ramaswami Naidu, K. Vinayakam and A.A. Rasheed
  389. Pillay, K.K., History of Local Self- Government in the Madras Presidency, 1850-1919, Chunilal D. Barfivala, Bombay,
  390. 1953, p.i.

Article Post Production

    No data exists for the row/column.
Creative Commons License
Indian Streams Research Journal by Laxmi Book Publication is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Based on a work at http://oldisrj.lbp.world/Default.aspx.
Permissions beyond the scope of this license may be available at http://oldisrj.lbp.world/Default.aspx
Copyright © 2014 Indian Streams Research Journal. All rights reserved
Looking for information? Browse our FAQs, tour our sitemap, or contact ISRJ
Read our Privacy Policy Statement and Plagairism Policy. Use of this site signifies your agreement to the Terms of Use