DOI Prefix : 10.9780 | Journal DOI : 10.9780/22307850
Scroll to Top

Volume : III, Issue : III, April - 2013

STUDIES ON MONTHLY VARIATIONS OF BIOLOGICAL PARAMETERS OF GANESH POND, PUNE, MAHARASHTRA

PATIL .B.V1 , PATIL .V.A2 AND INAMDAR .S. A3

DOI : 10.9780/22307850, Published By : Laxmi Book Publication

Abstract :

The monthly studies on Ganesh pond have shown that, Ganesh pond has a unique ecosystem and the pond considered as a slightly eutrophic pond. The phytoplankton analysis of Ganesh pond showed dominance of Cyanophycean members. Among Cyanophycean members the genera Microcystis was most dominant. Next to Cyanophycean the Chlorophycean members are found dominant. The zooplankton analysis of Ganesh pond showed the dominance of Rotifera. The Cladocera also recorded but their number is less than that of Rotifera. The group Ostracoda represented by single genera. In and around the Ganesh pond the aquatic macrophytes recorded belongs to angiosperms. The study presented here on Ganesh pond was designed to provide baseline data on the biological parameters of Ganesh pond. It is an initial study for Ganesh pond. The biological study of Ganesh pond showed that the pond is a natural ecosystem.

Keywords :


Article :


Cite This Article :

PATIL .B.V1 , PATIL .V.A2 AND INAMDAR .S. A3, (2013). STUDIES ON MONTHLY VARIATIONS OF BIOLOGICAL PARAMETERS OF GANESH POND, PUNE, MAHARASHTRA. Indian Streams Research Journal, Vol. III, Issue. III, DOI : 10.9780/22307850, http://oldisrj.lbp.world/UploadedData/2260.pdf

References :

  1. Battish F. E. 1992. Freshwater Zooplanktons of India, Oxford and IBH Publishing Co. Ltd. New Delhi.
  2. Best J. H. and Eddy F. B. 2003. Effects of Microcystis cells, cell extracts and lipopolysaccharide on drinking and liver function in rainbow trout Oncorhynchus mykiss Walbaum. Aquat. Toxicol. 64: 419-426.
  3. Chowdhury A. H. and Mamun A. A. 2006. Physico-chemical conditions and plankton population of two fish ponds in Khulna. Univ. J. Zool. Rajsthan Univ. Vol. 25. pp. 41-44.
  4. Christopher R. P. 2004. An ecological assessment of the trophic structure of York pond in Coos Country. UNH Center for Freshwater Biology Research 6 (3): 45-62.
  5. Dodds W. K. 2002 Fresh water ecology concepts and environmental applications. Published by Elsevier, a division of Reed Elsevier India Pvt. New Delhi 110024.
  6. Fritsh F. E. 1979. “The structure and reproduction of algae”, Vol. 2, Vikas Publication house Pvt Ltd., New Delhi.
  7. Goel, P. K., Trivedi R. K. 1987. Practical Methods in Ecology and Environmental Science. Enviro Media Publications. Post Box 60 Karad, (India).
  8. Islam M. A., Chowdhury A. H. and Zaman M. 2001. Limnology of fishponds in Rajasthan, Bangladesh. Ecol. Env. And Cons. 7 (1): 1-7.
  9. Lacky's J. B. 1938. The manipulation and counting of river plankton and changes in some organisms due to formalin preservation. U.S. Public health Reports. 53: 2080-2093.
  10. Loreau M., Downing A., Emmerson M., Gonzales A., Hughes J., Inchauti P., Joshi J., Norberg J. and Sala O. 2002. A new look the relationship between diversity and stability. In: Biodiversity and ecosystem Functioning: Synthesis and Perspectives (Eds M. Loreau, S. Naeem and P. Inchausti), pp. 79-91
  11. Mitra A. and Patra K. C. 1990. Ecology of planktonic copepods in the Mandarmani Creek of West Bengal, India. J. Mar. Sci. 19 (4): 278-281.
  12. Muhammad A., Abdus S., Sumayya I., Tasveer Z. B. and Kamran A. Q. 2005. Studies on monthly variations in Biological and physico-chemical parameters of brackish water fish pond, Muzaffar garh, Pakistan. Journal of Research (Science), Bahauddin Zalariya University, Multan, Pakistan. Vol. 16, No. 1 pp. 27-38. Munwar M. 1974. Limnology studies on freshwater pond of Hyderabad, India. Hydrobiologia. 44: 13-27.
  13. Naz S. 1999. Studies on the limnological characteristics and trophic status of pisciculture Ponds in Rajshahi. Unpubl. Ph.D. thesis, Department of Botany Rajshahi University. 28 pp
  14. Palmer C. M. 1969. Composite rating of algae tolerating organic pollution. J. phycol. 5: 78-82. Pingale S. D. 1981. Studies on algae of impondments and streams in Maharashtra. Ph.D thesis, University of Pune.
  15. Schmid B. Joshi J. and Schlapfer F. 2002. Emperical evidence for biodiversity-ecosystem functioning relationships. In: The Functional Consequences of Biodiversity: Emperical Progress and Thoretical Extensions (Eds. A.P. Kinzig, S.W. Pacala and D. Tilman), pp. 120-150. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
  16. Shayam R. 1991. Comparative dynamics of zooplankton in a tropical freshwater swamp and in newly constructed pond in swampy area. J. Appl. Zoo. Res. 2(2): 80-84
  17. Tonapi G. P. 1980. “Fresh Water Animals of India”. Oxford and IBH publishing Co. Ltd. New Delhi.
  18. Trivedy R. K. 1986. Role of Algae in Biomonitoring of water pollution. Asian Environment 1986: 31-42.
  19. Vargese M. and Nail L. P. 1992. Hydrobiological studies of a domestically polluted tropical pond. Poll. Res. 11 (2): 101-102.

Article Post Production

Article Indexed In

Comments :
Enter Name :
Email ID :
Comments :

Previous Comments :
Creative Commons License
Indian Streams Research Journal by Laxmi Book Publication is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Based on a work at http://oldisrj.lbp.world/Default.aspx.
Permissions beyond the scope of this license may be available at http://oldisrj.lbp.world/Default.aspx
Copyright © 2014 Indian Streams Research Journal. All rights reserved
Looking for information? Browse our FAQs, tour our sitemap, or contact ISRJ
Read our Privacy Policy Statement and Plagairism Policy. Use of this site signifies your agreement to the Terms of Use