DOI Prefix : 10.9780 | Journal DOI : 10.9780/22307850
Scroll to Top

Volume : II, Issue : VIII, September - 2012

A Comparative Study Of Creativity Level Of Students From Marathi And English Medium Students

Kallave Maheshwar Gangadharrao

DOI : 10.9780/22307850, Published By : Laxmi Book Publication

Abstract :

When considering young children, it is appropriate to adopt a broad, democratic definition of creativity. In this way, every child can be considered to have creative potential and to be capable of creative expression. It is important to consider what might constitute 'originality' in the work of a young child. After all, only a child prodigy could be expected to come up with something new and valuable to society. Instead, each child's creative abilities can be related to his/her personal stage of development. For example, a young child's work may be adaptive and original for that particular child and/or in relation to children in their class or age group.

Keywords :


Article :


Cite This Article :

Kallave Maheshwar Gangadharrao, (2012). A Comparative Study Of Creativity Level Of Students From Marathi And English Medium Students. Indian Streams Research Journal, Vol. II, Issue. VIII, DOI : 10.9780/22307850, http://oldisrj.lbp.world/UploadedData/1291.pdf

References :

  1. Beghetto, R.A. (2005). Does assessment kill student creativity? The Educational Forum, 69 (2), 254-263.
  2. Cannatella, H. (2004). Embedding creativity in teaching and learning. Journal of Aesthetic Education, 38(4), 59-70.
  3. Cropley, A.J. (1997). Fostering creativity in the classroom. In M.A. Runco (Ed.), The creativity research handbook, volume one (pp.83-114). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
  4. Eissler, K.R. (1978). Creativity and Adolescence—The Effect of Trauma in Freud's Adolescence,The Psychoanalytic Study of the Child, 33, 461-517.
  5. Frederick, C. M., & Price, B. (2001). Thinking creatively about religion: Belief-related differences. Journal of Creative Behavior, 35(3), 205-224.
  6. Gardner,H.(1988).Creativity: An interdisciplinary perspective. Creative Research Journal,1,8 26.
  7. Helson, R. (1996). In search of the creative personality, Creativity Research Journal, 9, 295-306.
  8. Nassif, C. and Quevillon, R. (2008). The development of a preliminary creativity scale for the MMPI-2: The C scale, Creativity Research Journal. 20(1), 13–20.
  9. Klein, P.S. (1975). Effects of open vs. structured teacher-student interaction on creativity of children with different levels of anxiety. Psychology in the Schools, 12, 286-288.
  10. Raina, M.K. & Raina, U. (1974). Creativity research in cross-cultural perspective. Indian Educational Review, 9, 140- 167.
  11. Torrance, E. P. (1993). The beyonders in a thirty year longitudinal study of creative achievement, Roeper Review. 15, 131-135.
  12. Wallach, M.A. & Kogan, N. (1965). Models of thinking in young children. New York: Holt, Rinehart &Winston.

Article Post Production

Article Indexed In

Comments :

Enter Name :
Email ID :
Comments :

Previous Comments :

Creative Commons License
Indian Streams Research Journal by Laxmi Book Publication is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Based on a work at http://oldisrj.lbp.world/Default.aspx.
Permissions beyond the scope of this license may be available at http://oldisrj.lbp.world/Default.aspx
Copyright © 2014 Indian Streams Research Journal. All rights reserved
Looking for information? Browse our FAQs, tour our sitemap, or contact ISRJ
Read our Privacy Policy Statement and Plagairism Policy. Use of this site signifies your agreement to the Terms of Use